Since the Civil Service Law is not listed in Chapter 150E Section 7 (d), decisions of the Civil Service Commission are not subject to bargaining. Third, the past practice of the Boston Police Department has involved unilateral development of promotional exams without bargaining with its unions. The development of the next promotional exam is entirely consistent with this practice.

The City further states that Rebecca Boutin, David Kennedy, and Kyle Miltimore did not engage in activity protected by the provisions of M.G.L. c. 150E, or any other statute, and that Rebecca Boutin, David Kennedy, and Kyle Miltimores employment was terminated for good and just cause under applicable law. 1 The City further states that Rebecca Boutin, David Kennedy, and Kyle Miltimore have appealed their terminations to the Civil Service Commission

in physical and/or emotional harm or 16 worse, to employees and citizens alike, the same can be said regarding Egloffs conduct 17 towards Nurse. 18 demonstrates that the Citys legitimate reasons, standing alone, would not have caused 19 it to terminate all three Charging Parties.18 That the City promoted Egloff but terminated the Charging Parties 18 In its Supplementary Statement, the Charging Parties asked the CERB to take judicial notice of the Civil

The City further states that Rebecca Boutin, David Kennedy, and Kyle Miltimore did not engage in activity protected by the provisions of M.G.L. c. 150E, or any other statute, and that Rebecca Boutin, David Kennedy, and Kyle Miltimores employment was terminated for good and just cause under applicable law. 1 The City further states that Rebecca Boutin, David Kennedy, and Kyle Miltimore have appealed their terminations to the Civil Service Commission

in physical and/or emotional harm or 16 worse, to employees and citizens alike, the same can be said regarding Egloffs conduct 17 towards Nurse. 18 demonstrates that the Citys legitimate reasons, standing alone, would not have caused 19 it to terminate all three Charging Parties.18 That the City promoted Egloff but terminated the Charging Parties 18 In its Supplementary Statement, the Charging Parties asked the CERB to take judicial notice of the Civil

The City further states that Rebecca Boutin, David Kennedy, and Kyle Miltimore did not engage in activity protected by the provisions of M.G.L. c. 150E, or any other statute, and that Rebecca Boutin, David Kennedy, and Kyle Miltimores employment was terminated for good and just cause under applicable law. 1 The City further states that Rebecca Boutin, David Kennedy, and Kyle Miltimore have appealed their terminations to the Civil Service Commission

in physical and/or emotional harm or 16 worse, to employees and citizens alike, the same can be said regarding Egloffs conduct 17 towards Nurse. 18 demonstrates that the Citys legitimate reasons, standing alone, would not have caused 19 it to terminate all three Charging Parties.18 That the City promoted Egloff but terminated the Charging Parties 18 In its Supplementary Statement, the Charging Parties asked the CERB to take judicial notice of the Civil

Any, dispute relative to the foregoing may be processed as a grievance under this Agreement or may be processed in accordance with law before the Civil Service Commission, provided, however, an employee may not pursue both his/her grievance/arbitration remedies and his/her statutory Civil Service remedies, if any, with respect to the same dispute, but must elect between them in writing, such election to be made after the action of the Chief of Police

Boston, Civil Service Commission, G1-07-241, July 9, 2009 (Henderson, Commissioner), citing and quoting from Commissioner of the Metropolitan Dist. Commission v. Director of Civil Service, 348 Mass. 184 at 187 (1964); other citations omitted. This is consistent with the recognition that appointments and promotions are inherent (and in this contract specified) reserved rights of management.

Civil Service Commission, 22 Mass. App.Ct. 364, 371 (1986). The Town has produced credible evidence that Officer Romeo sought reimbursement for a detail shift that he did not work. That conduct is tantamount to theft (or attempted theft), of public funds. The Town had further credible evidence that Officer Romco lied to Chief Delehanty about the supposed justification for his conduct not a single witness has corroborated his account.

Section 2: The Union agrees to represent all employees covered in this unit without regard to membership or participation in or association with the activities of the Union, or any _ come within the jurisdiction of said Civil Service Commission may be processed either as a grievance or as a Civil Service appeal, but not both..

(d) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, any matter which is subject to the jurisdiction of the Civil Service Commission established by law shall not be a subject of grievance or any Retirement or arbitration hereunder Board unless the employee makes an election as authorized under General Laws Chapter 150E, Section 8. 6|Page A grievance may be withdrawn by the employee initiating it or by the Union at any step of the proceedings

Any ngatter is subject to the jurisdiction of the Civil Service Commission Retirement Board established by law shall not be subject of grievance or arbitration hereunder, Complaints by Civil Service employees that they are being required by the Director Commission to ber form work outside their job descriptions shall be referred to the of Human Resources prior to making a complaint to the Director of Civil Service.

ARTICLE Il PROTECTION Employees employed under the Civil Service status shall be employed in accordance with and possess all of the rights afforded by Chapter 31 of the General Laws of Massachusetts and all applicable regulations of the Massachusetts Civil Service Commission and any other administrative body having jurisdiction in the premises issued thereunder. A.