City of Malden, retirement benefits of existing bargaining bargaining. 23 MLC 181, unit members 184 (1997). are a mandatory The future subject of City ofSomerville and Somerville School Committee (City of Somerville), MUP-09-5613, MUP-09-5614, MUP-09-5735, MUP-10-5765, MUP-10-5766, MUP-10- 5833, slip. op. at 7 (October 19, 2011) (citing Masconomet Regional School Committee 36 MLC 119, 120 (2010)); Town of Burlington, 35 MLC Glass, 404 US. 157, 180
The SJCs decision in City ofSomerville vy. CERB, 470 Mass. 563 (February 3, 2015) renders CERBs decision in the instant case wrong as a matter of law. It is undisputed that the legal issue presented in the instant case is identical to that before the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) in City ofSomerville vy. CERB, 470 Mass. 563 (February 3, 2015).
Commonwealth Employment 470 Mass. 563 (2015) (City ofSomerville).* Relations Board and City of another, The Court construed M.G.L. c. 32B, The Somerville School Committee. 2 Somerville Teachers Association, Somerville Police Superiors Officers Association, Somerville Administrators Association, and Somerville Municipal Employees Association, interveners. 3 The Supreme Judicial Court on its own initiative transferred the case from the Appeals Court
On February 3, 2015, while the Hullaappeals were pending, the Supreme Judicial Court decided City ofSomerville & another v. Commonwealth Employment Relations Board and another, 470 Mass. 563 (2015). That decision held that the appellants did not violate Section 10(a)(5) of the Law when the city unilaterally reduced its percentage contribution to retired employees group health insurance premiums without engaging in collective bargaining.
The central issue in this case was recently and squarely addressed by the CERB in City ofSomerville, 38 MLC 91 (2011) in which the CERB rejected the argument that the unions there were improperly attempting to bargain on behalf of retirees who are outside the scope of the bargaining unit. /d. at 93. The CERB held that Association's Brief MUP- 10-5951, et seq.
In In the matter of City ofSomerville, Somerville School Committee and Somerville Teachers Association and Somerville Administrators Association and Somerville Municipal Employees Association and Somerville Police Superior Officers Association, Department of Labor Relations, Commonwealth Employment Relations Board, Nos.
City of Malden, retirement benefits of existing bargaining bargaining. 23 MLC 181, unit members 184 (1997). are a mandatory The future subject of City ofSomerville and Somerville School Committee (City of Somerville), MUP-09-5613, MUP-09-5614, MUP-09-5735, MUP-10-5765, MUP-10-5766, MUP-10- 5833, slip. op. at 7 (October 19, 2011) (citing Masconomet Regional School Committee 36 MLC 119, 120 (2010)); Town of Burlington, 35 MLC Glass, 404 US. 157, 180
The SJCs decision in City ofSomerville vy. CERB, 470 Mass. 563 (February 3, 2015) renders CERBs decision in the instant case wrong as a matter of law. It is undisputed that the legal issue presented in the instant case is identical to that before the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) in City ofSomerville vy. CERB, 470 Mass. 563 (February 3, 2015).
Commonwealth Employment 470 Mass. 563 (2015) (City ofSomerville).* Relations Board and City of another, The Court construed M.G.L. c. 32B, The Somerville School Committee. 2 Somerville Teachers Association, Somerville Police Superiors Officers Association, Somerville Administrators Association, and Somerville Municipal Employees Association, interveners. 3 The Supreme Judicial Court on its own initiative transferred the case from the Appeals Court
On February 3, 2015, while the Hullaappeals were pending, the Supreme Judicial Court decided City ofSomerville & another v. Commonwealth Employment Relations Board and another, 470 Mass. 563 (2015). That decision held that the appellants did not violate Section 10(a)(5) of the Law when the city unilaterally reduced its percentage contribution to retired employees group health insurance premiums without engaging in collective bargaining.
The central issue in this case was recently and squarely addressed by the CERB in City ofSomerville, 38 MLC 91 (2011) in which the CERB rejected the argument that the unions there were improperly attempting to bargain on behalf of retirees who are outside the scope of the bargaining unit. /d. at 93. The CERB held that Association's Brief MUP- 10-5951, et seq.
In In the matter of City ofSomerville, Somerville School Committee and Somerville Teachers Association and Somerville Administrators Association and Somerville Municipal Employees Association and Somerville Police Superior Officers Association, Department of Labor Relations, Commonwealth Employment Relations Board, Nos.
City of Malden, retirement benefits of existing bargaining bargaining. 23 MLC 181, unit members 184 (1997). are a mandatory The future subject of City ofSomerville and Somerville School Committee (City of Somerville), MUP-09-5613, MUP-09-5614, MUP-09-5735, MUP-10-5765, MUP-10-5766, MUP-10- 5833, slip. op. at 7 (October 19, 2011) (citing Masconomet Regional School Committee 36 MLC 119, 120 (2010)); Town of Burlington, 35 MLC Glass, 404 US. 157, 180
The SJCs decision in City ofSomerville vy. CERB, 470 Mass. 563 (February 3, 2015) renders CERBs decision in the instant case wrong as a matter of law. It is undisputed that the legal issue presented in the instant case is identical to that before the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) in City ofSomerville vy. CERB, 470 Mass. 563 (February 3, 2015).
Commonwealth Employment 470 Mass. 563 (2015) (City ofSomerville).* Relations Board and City of another, The Court construed M.G.L. c. 32B, The Somerville School Committee. 2 Somerville Teachers Association, Somerville Police Superiors Officers Association, Somerville Administrators Association, and Somerville Municipal Employees Association, interveners. 3 The Supreme Judicial Court on its own initiative transferred the case from the Appeals Court
On February 3, 2015, while the Hullaappeals were pending, the Supreme Judicial Court decided City ofSomerville & another v. Commonwealth Employment Relations Board and another, 470 Mass. 563 (2015). That decision held that the appellants did not violate Section 10(a)(5) of the Law when the city unilaterally reduced its percentage contribution to retired employees group health insurance premiums without engaging in collective bargaining.
The central issue in this case was recently and squarely addressed by the CERB in City ofSomerville, 38 MLC 91 (2011) in which the CERB rejected the argument that the unions there were improperly attempting to bargain on behalf of retirees who are outside the scope of the bargaining unit. /d. at 93. The CERB held that Association's Brief MUP- 10-5951, et seq.
In In the matter of City ofSomerville, Somerville School Committee and Somerville Teachers Association and Somerville Administrators Association and Somerville Municipal Employees Association and Somerville Police Superior Officers Association, Department of Labor Relations, Commonwealth Employment Relations Board, Nos.
01701 Braintree, MA 02184 Millbury, MA 01527 Framingham, MA 01702 Framingham MA, 01702 Somerville MA, 01702 Somerville, MA 02144 Framingham, MA 01702 Framingham, MA 01702 Framingham, MA 01702 Allston, MA 02134 Framingham, MA 01701 N.
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Between City ofSomerville And SEUI Local 888 (E-911 Call Taker / Dispatchers) Effective: July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2013 The parties, City of Somerville ("City") and the Service Employees International Union, Local 888 ("SEIU", Local 888 or "Union") hereby agree to incorporate the following terms of this Memorandum of Agreement into a successor collective bargaining agreement effective: July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2013
City of Malden, retirement benefits of existing bargaining bargaining. 23 MLC 181, unit members 184 (1997). are a mandatory The future subject of City ofSomerville and Somerville School Committee (City of Somerville), MUP-09-5613, MUP-09-5614, MUP-09-5735, MUP-10-5765, MUP-10-5766, MUP-10- 5833, slip. op. at 7 (October 19, 2011) (citing Masconomet Regional School Committee 36 MLC 119, 120 (2010)); Town of Burlington, 35 MLC Glass, 404 US. 157, 180
The SJCs decision in City ofSomerville vy. CERB, 470 Mass. 563 (February 3, 2015) renders CERBs decision in the instant case wrong as a matter of law. It is undisputed that the legal issue presented in the instant case is identical to that before the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) in City ofSomerville vy. CERB, 470 Mass. 563 (February 3, 2015).
Commonwealth Employment 470 Mass. 563 (2015) (City ofSomerville).* Relations Board and City of another, The Court construed M.G.L. c. 32B, The Somerville School Committee. 2 Somerville Teachers Association, Somerville Police Superiors Officers Association, Somerville Administrators Association, and Somerville Municipal Employees Association, interveners. 3 The Supreme Judicial Court on its own initiative transferred the case from the Appeals Court
On February 3, 2015, while the Hullaappeals were pending, the Supreme Judicial Court decided City ofSomerville & another v. Commonwealth Employment Relations Board and another, 470 Mass. 563 (2015). That decision held that the appellants did not violate Section 10(a)(5) of the Law when the city unilaterally reduced its percentage contribution to retired employees group health insurance premiums without engaging in collective bargaining.
The central issue in this case was recently and squarely addressed by the CERB in City ofSomerville, 38 MLC 91 (2011) in which the CERB rejected the argument that the unions there were "improperly attempting to bargain on behalf of retirees who are outside the scope of the bargaining unit." ld at 93. The CERB held that Association's Brief MUP-IO-595J, et seq.
In In the matter of City ofSomerville, Somerville School Committee and Somerville Teachers Association and Somerville Administrators Association and Somerville Municipal Employees Association and Somerville Police Superior Officers Association, Department of Labor Relations, Commonwealth Employment Relations Board, Nos.
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ONE ASHBURTON PLACE BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02108 (617) 727-2200 www.mass.gov/ago MARTHA COAKLEY AnoRNEy GENERAL October 20, 2011 David Shapiro Assistant City Solicitor City ofSomerville 93 Highland Avenue Somerville, IVIA 02143 RE: Open Meeting Law Complaint Dear Attorney Shapiro: This office received a complaint from Mr.
The Somerville Municipal Employees Association (SMEA) and the City ofSomerville (City) agree to the following terms and conditions to settle MUP-10-5857 The City shall pay Alan Koslofsky $14,000.00 in backpay by September 2, 201 1. 1.
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Between City ofSomerville And Somerville Police Employees Association Concerning Distribution of Overtime The parties, the City ofSomerville (City) and the Somerville Police Employees Association (SPEA or Union) hereby agree as follows: 1. The parties agree that the Union has raised concerns about the present practice concerning the fair and equitable distribution of overtime; 2.
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN IAFF, LOCAL 76 AND CITY OFSOMERVILLE JLMC 10-12-F January 19, 2012 The parties hereby agree to the following terms and conditions for a successor collective bargaining agreement covering the time period July +, 2007 to June 30, 2010: 1.