One of the agreements cited pertains to a contract settlement with the Commonwealth where funds were appropriated in advance of the settlement of this contract. This agreement enjoyed a status that was in accord with Secretarys Shors statements. The University by contrast, remained without any bargaining reserves in contradiction to Secretary Shors statements.

Charging party has asserted that the specific reserve established by St. 2015, c. 10 for the University is intended for future bargaining settlements and is independent of the legislative validation created by section 65. The reserve established by section 2 line item 1599-4299 provides a partial reserve for the University of $2.2 million for agreements that have not yet been ratified by the general court.

Atwater: Pursuant to the terms of the parties Settlement Agreement dated March |, 2016, the Charging Party, Massachusetts Society of Professors, Lowell/MTA/NEA, hereby withdraws its Charge of Prohibited Practice in the above matter and requests that the Department dismiss its Complaint. The pre-hearing conference scheduled for March 22, 2016 and the hearing scheduled for April 12, 2016 may therefore be canceled. Thank you.

KELLEY, ) ) Charging Party, and the BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Respondent. ) ) ) MUP-14-3679 ) SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ) ) ) This Settlement Agreement is made this day of June, 2014 by and between the Boston Public Schools (BPS) and Mr. James W. Kelley (Mr. Kelley). WHEREAS the parties wish to resolve the above-captioned charge, they agree and represent as follows: 1.

Kelley has been actively engaged in litigation against the Boston Public Schools in a matter that is presently pending before the Department of Labor Relations (MUP-111191) and, but he is certainly open to engaging in settlement discussions with the aim amicably resolving this new Charge. Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been 2 made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1).

Herman requested a ... copy of the settlement agreement cited in the article at the following [identified] link. The City provided a response to Mr. Herman on August 12, 2024. Unsatisfied with the Citys response, Mr. Herman petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR24/2285, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records.

The matter was resolved by a settlement agreement in November 2019. One of the material terms of the Settlement Agreement was that the Employer agreed to provide bargaining unit members with tax assistance for the filing of their 2019 tax returns. However, the Employer has failed to comply with this aspect of the Settlement Agreement and as of March 2020 has indicated it does not intend to comply. 36.

Good afternoon, The parties have reached a settlement of this matter, and the Union therefore withdraws the charge of prohibited practice. Thank you, James ________________________ James A.W. Shaw, Esq.

.): The Town of Plymouth through its duly authorized agent, Town Manager, Pamela Nolan, has again repudiated the terms of a confidential settlement agreement between the Town of Plymouth and AFSCME Local 2824 by refusing to return Dale Webber to a position in the Parks Division as outlined in the settlement agreement. By these and other acts the party complained of has interfered with, restrained and/or coerced rights guaranteed by the Law.

On September 10, 2003, AFSCME, Council 93, Local 2824 (Union) filed a charge with the Commission, alleging that the Town of Plymouth (Town) had violated Sections 10(a)(5) and 10(a)(1) of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 150E (the Law) by repudiating the terms of a confidential settlement agreement (Agreement).'

Therefore, Department of Labor Relations is subject to postponement merely at settlement agreement into future | caution the parties not to incorporate paragraph 5 of the MUP-10-6074 settlement agreements. Kathleen Goodberlet, Esq.

Laws ch. 258 are intended to promote settlement. Therefore, pursuant to Chapter 258, the Framingham Police is entitled to a period of six (6) months to respond to this letter after which suit maybe filed, during which we may seek further damages as permitted. ~ 1 Framingham Pof~ce D~~artmen~ ./ =;,,, :{ N { f/ jfM~ / ` 1 1 f , ! ~~ I ~ ' 1~5 / ? : 1 Wiliam Welch Way Framingham, MA 01702 !`/j~` ~~pKPORA~~~ ~~; ~ ~ .~~,~ i ~ORPQFtA`"' tI.? -.

[I] Yes [I No Fait accompli Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name Boston Police Superior Officers Federation 19. 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number Leah M.

In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Re: Daniel Sullivan ) ) NAGE ) And ) ) DANIEL SULLIVAN ) DLROCT1614pH1:14 ) And ) ) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Department of Public Health Tewksbury State Hospital ) ) ) SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Public Health/Tewksbury State Hospital (Hospital or Commonwealth or Department), NAGE (the Union), and Daniel Sullivan desire an amicable settlement of all claims which

OF PUBLIC HEALTH UNION SEIU/NAGE UNION REPRESENTATION Manuel Pimentel - Settlement Offer Pave | of | Manuel Pimentel - Settle ment Offer O'Connor, Martha (EHS) Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 3:20 To: Leo {lmunroe@nage.org) pM CONFIDENTIAL Leo, As we discussed, DPH makes the following settlement offer to resolve all outstanding gri behalf of Manuel Pimentel, incl evances filed by or on uding but not limited to OER #s 12-41030; 12-41029; 1341825; DPH

One of the agreements cited pertains to a contract settlement with the Commonwealth where funds were appropriated in advance of the settlement of this contract. This agreement enjoyed a status that was in accord with Secretarys Shors statements. The University by contrast, remained without any bargaining reserves in contradiction to Secretary Shors statements.

Charging party has asserted that the specific reserve established by St. 2015, c. 10 for the University is intended for future bargaining settlements and is independent of the legislative validation created by section 65. The reserve established by section 2 line item 1599-4299 provides a partial reserve for the University of $2.2 million for agreements that have not yet been ratified by the general court.

Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made the charging party. INFORMATION 17. MTA 22. ON CHARGING PARTY 20. Telephone Number 18. Representative to contact Name Matthew MSP/FSU/MTA/NEA 19. by 456 CMR 15.04(1) (617) 878-8283 D. Jones, Esq. 21.