FAX Number |134 south second st New bedford Ma 02740 EMPLOYER'S LABOR RELATIONS REPRESENTATIVE '8. Name Steven Beauregard 9. Telephone Number 508-997-4806 10,11,12,13. Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP 14. FAX Number code) 134 south second st New bedford Ma 02740 15. E-mail address |Steven.beauregard@newbedfordhousingauthority.org | | 16. Firm/Organization Name New Bedford housing authority EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION (if any) 17.

City of New Bedford, 471Mass,446 (2015) and Suffolk Constr. Co. v. Div. of Capital Asset Mgmt., 449 Mass. 444 (2007) to support this position. Again, it is unclear whether this is the sole responsive record. As indicated below, the MBTA has failed to meet its legal obligations under statute, regulation and case law to support such withholding. John Englander, Esq.

City of New Bedford.

City of New Bedford." The Office contends that "[i]f disclosed, these records could reveal legal strategies and policies that may impede current or future investigations, undermine the defense of any legal challenges, or prematurely disclose strategies in current or planned enforcement actions within the [Office's] Division of Open Government."

City of New Bedford, 471 Mass. 446 (2015). In DaRosa, the SJC concluded that opinion work product that was prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial by or for a party or its representative falls within the scope of Exemption (d). Id. at 448. It also concluded that fact work product under Mass. R. Civ.

City of New Bedford, 471 Mass. 446 (2015). In DaRosa, the SJC concluded that opinion work product that was prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial by or for a party or its representative falls within the scope of Exemption (d). Id. at 448. It also concluded that fact work product under Mass. R. Civ.

City of New Bedford, 471 Mass. 446 (2015). In DaRosa, the SJC concluded that opinion work product that was prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial by or for a party or its representative falls within the scope of Exemption (d). Id. at 448. It also Allison Mondello Page 3 June 10, 2025 SPR25/1483 concluded that fact work product under Mass. R. Civ.

City of New Bedford, 471 Mass. 446 (2015); Suffolk Const. Co. v. Div. of Cap. Asset Mgmt., Michelle Burwell Page 3 October 26, 2022 SPR22/2307 449 Mass. 444 (2007).) After querying the EOTSS personnel involved in those intra-EOTSS discussions, EOTSS has determined that no EOTSS personnel discussed your request to EOTSS with any employees or representatives of any other Commonwealth entity.

City of New Bedford, 471 Mass. 446 (2015)(opinion work product sought in anticipation of or during the pendency of litigation is protected from disclosure under the Public Records Law); and Matter of the Reorg. of Elec. Mut.Liab. Ins. Co. (Bermuda), 425 Mass. 419, 423 (1997) ([I]t is fundamental that only a client can waive the attorney-client privilege.) In his appeal petition, Mr.

City of New Bedford, 471 Mass. 446 (2015)(opinion work product sought in anticipation of or during the pendency of litigation is protected from disclosure under the Public Records Law); and Matter of the Reorg. of Elec. Mut.Liab. Ins. Co. (Bermuda), 425 Mass. 419, 423 (1997) ([I]t is fundamental that only a client can waive the attorney-client privilege.). Erin G. Brown, Esq.

In another case that involves drug use, the Commission found that the City of New Bedford had just cause for the termination of a garbage-truck driver for testing positive for cocaine use notwithstanding the employees excellent record of service or the extraordinary circumstances surrounding his personal life. Burt v. City of New Bedford, D-5931, 11 MCSR 202 (1998).