Guha requested the settlement agreement between the School and a former employee. You denied her request, claiming that the responsive record "constitutes a personnel matter subject to exemption G.L. c. 4, 7 clause 26(c) and disclosure of such may constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy." The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G.

Specifically, the Gaughens requested a copy of settlement agreements entered into between the Schools and parents from January 1, 2012 to the present (October 24, 2016, date of the request), relative to the provision of special education services and educational placement(s) for students with disabilities, redacted of all personally-identifiable information.

At the outset, it is important to note that this decision is the result of an investigation solely into whether the Board violated the Open Meeting Law, and has no bearing on the merits of the Housatonic Rest of River Settlement Agreement or whether it is good policy, issues which underlie the complaint.

Miller requested "ALL names and records of separation, severance, transition and/or settlement connected to the FY15, FY16, and FY 17 settlements paid out of the Commonwealth's settlements and judgment account on behalf of ANF and its agencies." Mr. Miller included a spreadsheet detailing such payments for those fiscal years. Mr.

Herman submitted the following five separate requests: a) [C]opies of any and all records found at the link below for settlements and/or judgments made on behalf of the Office of the Attorney General. b) [C]opies of any and all records found at the link below for settlements and/or judgments made on behalf of the Department of Children and Families. c) [C]opies of any and all records found at the link below for settlements and/or judgments made on

The AGO redacted the balance of the record entitled, "Confidential Settlement Communication" under Exemptions (d) and (f) of the Public Records Law. Mr. Dorsey petitioned the Supervisor and the current appeal, SPR19/0049, was opened.

Exemption (c) -personnel clause The Schools are withholding a record notifying the former Superintendent that his position would not be renewed and a severance/settlement agreement with a former School Superintendent pursuant to Exemption (c) of the Public Records Law. A review of Exemption (c) is appropriate.

The parties engaged in settlement negotiations. At no point in these negotiations was there any discussion about the case being settled as a class action, nor was there any discussion of the Union waiving any rights to pursue separate grievances. At all times, the parties discussed settling the matter on an individual basis for Iris Cortez. On December 16, 2019, the parties reached agreement on a settlement to resolve the arbitration.

The bulk of the evidence in this case concerned comparison of the proposals to other settlements within the City (internal comparability), comparison with similar units in other communities (external comparability), and ability to pay.

Police lieutenants and sergeants Name and Titles of Members of Bargaining Committees Union Management See attachment A Manner of Settlement mediation; Petition Submitted By: Signgtyreand T)ffe Wek in Last Two Contract Negotiations (Mediation, Fact Finding, etc.) negotiations Labor Organization [ ] Municipality [ ] sointy of of Principal of Petitioning Party Covne ( Ge ate me 3 Signature and Title of Principal Represeytative of Other Party if Joint

More specifically, the Charging Party alleges that the negotiated settlement agreement between the City of Boston and the Union that resolved fifteen (15) compensation grade appeal arbitrations violated the collective bargaining agreement, the SEIU Constitution and Bylaws, and ' The City received this charge via email on July 23, 2013. The following employees joined Ms.

Following the arbitration awards, the Union and the City entered into settlement discussions on the remaining appeals pending at arbitration. The City offered a settlement proposal whereby six (6) of the pending fifteen (15) appeals would be allowed and the nine (9) appeals of the Appellants would be withdrawn and not pursued to arbitration. The Union accepted the Citys proposal.

Vv] Yes L] No Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name 18. Representative to contact Tomasa Pujol 19. 20.