See Town of Winthrop, MUP-4879 (1982); Town ofNatick, 7 MLC 1049, 1059 (1980) 10. The City through its attorney violated Sections 10(2)(1) and (3) of the Law by filing an IAD complaint against Berquist because he testified in a Civil Service hearing. 11. The City violated Section 10(a)(3) of the Law by retaliating against Berquist based upon his testimony in support of another officer at the Civil Service Commission.
See Town of Winthrop, MUP-4879 (1982); Town ofNatick, 7 MLC 1049, 1059 (1980) 10. The City through its attorney violated Sections 10(2)(1) and (3) of the Law by filing an IAD complaint against Berquist because he testified in a Civil Service hearing. 11. The City violated Section 10(a)(3) of the Law by retaliating against Berquist based upon his testimony in support of another officer at the Civil Service Commission.
The City has been made aware of the Decision in the Town ofNatick And Natick Patrol Officers Association ULP decision in case MUP-15-4244. Despite the demand to bargain and knowledge of the Town ofNatick case, this morning, August 1, 2017, the first two patrol officers were taken from their typical duties for the purposes of Narcan training. Copy attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as "B."
ofNatick shall participate in the management of the Association or act as its representative if such activity would be incompatible with his/her official duties.
ARTICLE XXVII - Group Life Insurance The Group Life Insurance coverage in existence on the effective date of this Agreement and described in the most current Staff Manual, and further described in the Town ofNatick publication "Employees Group Insurance Plan," shall be continued throughout the term of this Agreement.
The Investigator stated in her dismissal that the present case is analogous to Town ofNatick, MUP -15-4244 (unpublished CERB review, July 13, 2015), where the CERB held that the Towns decision to require police officers to administer Narcan to combat overdoses as first responders was a level of services decision regarding the deployment of public safety personnel made in furtherance of [a] public health policy.
The Commonwealths decision in this case is analogous to Town ofNatick, MUP-15-4244 (unpublished CERB review, July 13, 2015), where the CERB held that in light of the Governors declared public health emergency 5 Dismissal (cont.)
Town ofNatick, 2 MLC 1086, 1092, MUP-2098, 2102 (1975). Here, the investigation record shows that on September 3, 2020, the Employer gave the Union the opportunity to engage in impact bargaining over the implementation of the testing program.
Army Research Center in Natick, MA in 1979 and settled in Framingham. Dr. Dunne retired as the Senior Advisor in Advanced Processing and Nutritional Biochemistry in the Combat Feeding Program at the Natick labs in Sept. 2012. He led Dual Use Science and Technology projects in advanced food processing technologies pulsed electric field, high pressure processing and microwave processing.
Murray Supervisor of Records November 29, 2018 SPRlS/1766 Diane Packer Natick Town Clerk 13 East Central Street Natick Town Hall, I st Floor Natick, MAO 1760 Dear Diane Packer: I have received the petition of Ronald Alexander appealing the nonresponse of the Town ofNatick (Town) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, JOA; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1 ). Specifically on October 26, 2018, Mr.
City of Newton and Newton Municipal Employees Association, 35 MLC 296 (2009); City of Westfield and International Brotherhood of Police Officers, 22 MLC 1394 (1996); City of Springfield and IBPO, Local 364, 16 MLC 1127 (1989); City of Newton and Newton Police Association, 27 MLC 74 (2000); Town of Harwich and Harwich Police Federation, 32 MLC 27 (2005); Town ofNatick and Local 311, IBPO 18 M:C 1155 (1991); City of Boston and BPSOF, MUP-04-4295 (2006
Lorenz: I have received your petition appealing the response of Town ofNatick- Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66 1OA; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, you are appealing the substantive nature of the Department's letter of response, dated January 12, 2017. Please be advised that your letter of appeal to this office was missing crucial parts. G.L. c. 66 lO(b ); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1 )(g).