Chief Medical Examiner, 404 Mass. 132, 135 (1987). The second clause of Exemption (c) does not protect all data relating to specifically named individuals. Rather, it only permits custodians of records to withhold "intimate details of a highly personal nature." Attorney Gen. v. Assistant Comm'r of the Real Prop. Dep't of Boston, 380 Mass. 623, 625 (1980).

Chief Medical Examiner, 404 Mass. 132, 135 (1989) (The Legislature has made such medical files or information absolutely exempt.)

Chief Medical Examiner, 404 Mass. 132, 135 (1987). Lt. Michelle Mangino Page 6 June 9, 2017 SPRl 7/730 The second clause of Exemption ( c) does not protect all data relating to specifically named individuals. Rather, it only permits custodians of records to withhold "intimate details of a highly personal nature." Attorney Gen. v. Assistant Comm'r of the Real Prop. Dep't of Boston, 380 Mass. 623,625 (1980).

Chief Medical Examiner, 404 Mass. 132, 135 (1987). This exemption does not protect all data relating to specifically named individuals.

Chief Medical Examiner, 404 Mass. 132, 135 (1987).I find that the EEOA has properly withheld the medical information under the first clause of Exemption (c ). Exemption (I) The EOEEA is withholding names, identifying information and complete statements and investigatory information provided by witnesses in their entirety under Exemption (f) of the Public Records Law.

Chief Medical Examiner, 404 Mass. 132, 135 (1987). Analysis under the second clause of Exemption (c) is subjective in nature and requires a balancing of the public's right to know against the relevant privacy interests at stake. Torres v. Attorney Gen., 391 Mass. 1, 9 (1984); Attorney Gen. v. Assistant Comm'r of Real Property Dep't, 380 Mass. 623, 625 (1980). Therefore, determinations must be made on a case by case basis.

Chief Medical Examiner, 404 Mass. 132, 135 (1987). Second clause of Exemption (c) privacy Analysis under the second clause of Exemption (c) is subjective in nature and requires a balancing of the publics right to know against the relevant privacy interests at stake. Torres v. Attorney Gen., 391 Mass. 1, 9 (1984); Attorney Gen. v. Assistant Commr of Real Property Dept, 380 Mass. 623, 625 (1980).

Chief Medical Examiner, 404 Mass. 132, 136 (1989)); [2] 23 reports (such as BOP, KQ and III) received from the Department of Criminal Justice Services related to various identified individuals, withheld based on: Personal identifying information (including civilian witness names, dates of birth, addresses, social security numbers, drivers license numbers) (G.L. c. 4, 7 cl. 26(c)); and Criminal Offender Record Information and any information obtained

Chief Medical Examiner, 404 Mass. 132, 135 (1987). Chief David A. Armstrong Page 4 February 12,201 8 Second clause of Exemption (c) Analysis under the second clause of Exemption (c) is subjective in nature and requires a balancing of the public's right to know against the relevant privacy interests at stake. Torres v. Attorney Gen., 391 Mass. 1, 9 (1984); Attomev Gen. v. Assistant Comm'r of Real Property 380 Mass. 623,625 (1980).

Chief Medical Examiner, 404 Mass. 132, 135 (1987). Second clause of Exemption (c) privacy Analysis under the second clause of Exemption (c) is subjective in nature and requires a balancing of the publics right to know against the relevant privacy interests at stake. Torres v. Attorney Gen., 391 Mass. 1, 9 (1984); Attorney Gen. v. Assistant Commr of Real Property Dept, 380 Mass. 623, 625 (1980).