Tags
Agencies
Show All
Displaying items 211-220 of 303 in total
Public Records Division Appeals
SPR19/1408
1 document · · Secretary of the Commonwealth · Appeal · Massachusetts Port Authority · Rocheleau, Matthew · Closed
20191408 SPR19/1408 Appeal Initial Closed 20191408 Rocheleau, Matthew Massachusetts Port Authority 2019-05-28 0.00 No 15 Business Days (8-20-19) 2019-07-16 2019-07-30 No The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray S11pe111isor of Records July 30, 2019 SPR19/1408 Shawn M.
Department of Labor Relations Cases
Paul Coronite / Teamsters Local 25
3 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
Employer Massachusetts Port Authority 3. 2. Representative to contact 4. Telephone Number David Gambone 617-568-3178 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 5. Fax Number One Harborside Drive East Boston MA 02128 6. Employee Organization (if any): Boston Local 25 Teamsters 8. 617-568-3925 7. Representative to contact 9. Telephone Number Sean O'Brien 617-242-1652 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 10.
Background The Union is the exclusive bargaining representative for employees in a bargaining unit which includes the Aviation Officers who work at the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport). Coronite is a member of the bargaining unit and was employed as an Aviation Officer at Massport between December 2004 and June of 2012.
Department of Labor Relations Cases
ROBERT HERZOG, ET AL / TEAMSTERS, LOCAL 25
3 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
UPL-10-179 Overview In early 2010, ownership of the Tobin Bridge (Tobin) was legally transferred from the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport) to the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT). Following negotiations between the Union and Massport, Massport permitted the Tobin employees to exercise their bumping rights and transfer to its Aviation Division (Aviation).
1 document · · Department of Labor Relations ·
It also advised that for DOLs earned from 1997 through 2009, he should seek payment from the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport).> Thompson contacted Massport for payment of his DOLs, but it advised him on November 30, 2010 that the Department had instructed that no payments were due under the CBA.* Prior to his retirement, Thompson filed a complaint with the U.S.
18 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
TURLEY * * and * Date: October 22, 2020 * INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMENS * ASSOCIATION, LOCAL UNION NO. 809 * And MASSACHUSETTS PORT * AUTHORITY * * ************************************************ * CHARGING PARTYS REQUEST FOR REVIEW OF HEARING OFFICERS RULING IN THE CONSOLIDATED RULING ON MOTIONS TO QUASH Charging Party, David C. Turley (Charging Party or Mr.
TURLEY and INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMENS ASSOCIATION, LOCAL UNION NO. 809 And MASSACHUSETTS PORT AUTHORITY ************************************************ * * * * * * * * * * * Case No.: UPL-18-6690 Date: September 15, 2020 CHARGING PARTYS RESPONSE TO RESPONDENTS REQUEST FOR REVIEW OF HEARING OFFICERS RULING GRANTING CHARGING PARTYS REQUEST TO POSTPONE AND RULING ON SHOW CAUSE AND RULING ON RESPONDENTS MOTION TO CLOSE RECORD AND CONCLUDE HEARING Charging
TURLEY * * and * Date: August 21, 2020 * INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMENS * ASSOCIATION, LOCAL UNION NO. 809 * And MASSACHUSETTS PORT * AUTHORITY * * ************************************************ * CHARGING PARTYS RESPONSE TO SHOW CAUSE LETTER DATED AUGUST 14, 2020 Charging Party, David C.
The first motion was filed by the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport), requesting that I revoke a subpoena served on it by David C. Turley (Turley or Charging Party). The second motion was filed by the International Longshoremens Association, Local 809 (Union or Respondent), requesting that I revoke and vacate the same subpoena. For the reasons explained below, I grant the motions.
TURLEY * * and * * INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMENS * ASSOCIATION, LOCAL UNION NO. 809 * And MASSACHUSETTS PORT * AUTHORITY * * ************************************************ * Case No.: UPL-18-6690 Date: January 22, 2021 POST-HEARING BRIEF ON BEHALF OF DAVID C. TURLEY I. Issue Whether the Respondent, International Longshoremens Association, Local Union No. 809, violated G.L. c. 150A, 4A(4), as specified below. II.
Turley (Turley or Charging Party) 2 has been employed by the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport) as a Terminal 3 Operator. Turley is a member of the bargaining unit represented by the Union. In June 4 2018, Turley filed a prohibited practice charge at the DLR alleging that the Union had 5 violated Section 4A(4) of M.G.L c. 150A (the Law).
Turley (Turley or Charging Party) 2 has been employed by the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport) as a Terminal 3 Operator. Turley is a member of the bargaining unit represented by the Union. In June 4 2018, Turley filed a prohibited practice charge at the DLR alleging that the Union had 5 violated Section 4A(4) of M.G.L c. 150A (the Law).
We 8 begin by providing some relevant background. 9 Turley has been employed by the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport) as a 10 Terminal Operator since 2008 and is a member of the bargaining unit represented by 11 the International Longshoremens Association, Local 809 (Union).
The CERB issued a ruling on 6 the interlocutory appeal on October 6, 2020,5 which upheld my ruling on Motion XII. 7 On September 21, 2020, the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport, Authority, 8 MPA, or Employer) filed a Motion to Quash a subpoena that I had issued for Bremberg 9 on September 2, 2020 (Motion XIV).
The CERB issued a ruling on 4 the interlocutory appeal on October 6, 2020,4 which upheld my ruling on Motion XII. 5 On September 21, 2020, the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport, Authority, 6 MPA, or Employer) filed a Motion to Quash a subpoena that I had issued for Bremberg 7 on September 2, 2020 (Motion XIV).
CERB Decision on Appeal of HO Decision (contd) UPL-18-6690 1 Operators employed by the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport) in February and 2 May of 2018, and when the Union held a meeting and proposed a seniority amendment 3 to the Unions bylaws and constitution in March of 2018.2 The Hearing Officer, however, 4 dismissed another count that alleged that the Union had violated its duty of fair 5 representation when McGee bid ahead of Turley and
5 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
Massachusetts Port Authority (MassPort), 36 MLC 5, MUP-04-2669 (June 30, 2009) affd sub nom. Massachusetts Port Authority v. CERB, 78 Mass. App. Ct. 1122 (January 10 25, 2011) (unpublished ruling issued pursuant to Massachusetts Appeals Court Rule 1:28).
City of Newton, 46 MLC 20, 22, MUP-16-5532 (Aug. 20, 2019) (citing 9 Massachusetts Port Authority, 36 MLC 5, UP-04-2669 (June 30, 2009), affd sub nom. 10 Massachusetts Port Authority v. Commonwealth Employment Relations Board, 78 Mass. 11 App.
Department of Labor Relations Cases
New Bedford Police Union / New Bedford, City of
3 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
Town of Marion, 2 MLC 1256, 1258 (1975); In the Matter of Massachusetts Port Authority, 38 MLC 265 (2012). Of particular relevance, proposals regarding the scope of a bargaining unit are considered a permissive subject of bargaining. In the Matter of Somerville Fire Fighters Association, Local 1240, I.A.F.F. and 3 Joseph Crowley, 2000 WL 35733300; Boston Police Patrolmens Association, 8 MLC 1993, 2000 (1982), affd sub.
Department of Labor Relations Cases
OPEIU, Local 6 / Court Administrator of the Trial Court
2 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
City of Newton, 27 MLC 74, 81 2000, citing Commonwealth of Massachusetts the Labor Relations Commission, 404 Mass. 124, 127 (1989), City of Boston, 26 MLC 177, 181 (2000); Massachusetts Port Authority, 26 MLC 100, 101 (2000). The Plans seeks to change, in part, structural and administrative functions that will alter terms and conditions of employment for employees and members of Local 6.
Department of Labor Relations Cases
OPEIU, Local 6 / Court Administrator of the Trial Court
2 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
City of Newton, 27 MLC 74, 81 2000, citing Commonwealth of Massachusetts the Labor Relations Commission, 404 Mass. 124, 127 (1989), City of Boston, 26 MLC 177, 181 (2000); Massachusetts Port Authority, 26 MLC 100, 101 (2000). Further, an Employer has an obligation to bargain with the Union where the impact of its decision affects the employees conditions of employment. City of Worcester v.
4 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
Massachusetts Port Authority 26 MLC 100, 101 (2000) citing Melrose School Committee 9 MLC 1713, 1726 (1983). The CBA specifically accounts for the fact that a workweek consisting of consecutive regular work hours of work each day may not be practical, and as such, circumstances may call for an employee to work a split shift. Exhibit 1.
Displaying items 211-220 of 303 in total