TURLEY * * and * Date: October 22, 2020 * INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMENS * ASSOCIATION, LOCAL UNION NO. 809 * And MASSACHUSETTS PORT * AUTHORITY * * ************************************************ * CHARGING PARTYS REQUEST FOR REVIEW OF HEARING OFFICERS RULING IN THE CONSOLIDATED RULING ON MOTIONS TO QUASH Charging Party, David C. Turley (Charging Party or Mr.
TURLEY and INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMENS ASSOCIATION, LOCAL UNION NO. 809 And MASSACHUSETTS PORT AUTHORITY ************************************************ * * * * * * * * * * * Case No.: UPL-18-6690 Date: September 15, 2020 CHARGING PARTYS RESPONSE TO RESPONDENTS REQUEST FOR REVIEW OF HEARING OFFICERS RULING GRANTING CHARGING PARTYS REQUEST TO POSTPONE AND RULING ON SHOW CAUSE AND RULING ON RESPONDENTS MOTION TO CLOSE RECORD AND CONCLUDE HEARING Charging
TURLEY * * and * Date: August 21, 2020 * INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMENS * ASSOCIATION, LOCAL UNION NO. 809 * And MASSACHUSETTS PORT * AUTHORITY * * ************************************************ * CHARGING PARTYS RESPONSE TO SHOW CAUSE LETTER DATED AUGUST 14, 2020 Charging Party, David C.
The first motion was filed by the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport), requesting that I revoke a subpoena served on it by David C. Turley (Turley or Charging Party). The second motion was filed by the International Longshoremens Association, Local 809 (Union or Respondent), requesting that I revoke and vacate the same subpoena. For the reasons explained below, I grant the motions.
TURLEY * * and * * INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMENS * ASSOCIATION, LOCAL UNION NO. 809 * And MASSACHUSETTS PORT * AUTHORITY * * ************************************************ * Case No.: UPL-18-6690 Date: January 22, 2021 POST-HEARING BRIEF ON BEHALF OF DAVID C. TURLEY I. Issue Whether the Respondent, International Longshoremens Association, Local Union No. 809, violated G.L. c. 150A, 4A(4), as specified below. II.
Turley (Turley or Charging Party) 2 has been employed by the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport) as a Terminal 3 Operator. Turley is a member of the bargaining unit represented by the Union. In June 4 2018, Turley filed a prohibited practice charge at the DLR alleging that the Union had 5 violated Section 4A(4) of M.G.L c. 150A (the Law).
Turley (Turley or Charging Party) 2 has been employed by the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport) as a Terminal 3 Operator. Turley is a member of the bargaining unit represented by the Union. In June 4 2018, Turley filed a prohibited practice charge at the DLR alleging that the Union had 5 violated Section 4A(4) of M.G.L c. 150A (the Law).
We 8 begin by providing some relevant background. 9 Turley has been employed by the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport) as a 10 Terminal Operator since 2008 and is a member of the bargaining unit represented by 11 the International Longshoremens Association, Local 809 (Union).
The CERB issued a ruling on 6 the interlocutory appeal on October 6, 2020,5 which upheld my ruling on Motion XII. 7 On September 21, 2020, the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport, Authority, 8 MPA, or Employer) filed a Motion to Quash a subpoena that I had issued for Bremberg 9 on September 2, 2020 (Motion XIV).
The CERB issued a ruling on 4 the interlocutory appeal on October 6, 2020,4 which upheld my ruling on Motion XII. 5 On September 21, 2020, the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport, Authority, 6 MPA, or Employer) filed a Motion to Quash a subpoena that I had issued for Bremberg 7 on September 2, 2020 (Motion XIV).
CERB Decision on Appeal of HO Decision (contd) UPL-18-6690 1 Operators employed by the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport) in February and 2 May of 2018, and when the Union held a meeting and proposed a seniority amendment 3 to the Unions bylaws and constitution in March of 2018.2 The Hearing Officer, however, 4 dismissed another count that alleged that the Union had violated its duty of fair 5 representation when McGee bid ahead of Turley and