Active Litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactive litigation, administrative hearings or mediation. With respect to records requests numbered 1, 2 and 5, these requested records are the subjects of a disputein activelitigation. See Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
Active Litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactive litigation, administrative hearings or mediation.
Active Litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactive litigation, administrative hearings or mediation. With respect to Items 1, 2, and 5, these requested records are the subjects of a disputein activelitigation. See Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
Active Litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactive litigation, administrative hearings or mediation.
Pending litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactivelitigation, administrative hearings or mediation.
Pending litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactivelitigation, administrative hearings or mediation.
Pending litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactive litigation, administrative hearings or mediation. In light of the pending matter, I decline to opine on this matter at this time. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b).
Pending litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactive litigation, administrative hearings or mediation. Request for reconsideration In his request for reconsideration, Mr. Lodge asserted, [t]here is not active litigation in regards to the informants statements.
One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 (617) 727-2832 Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre pre@sec.state.ma.us John Pyers Page 2 June 30, 2022 SPR22/1304 Pending Litigation As noted in my previous determination, 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactive
Pending Litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactivelitigation, administrative hearings or mediation.
In a January 23, 2018 determination I declined to opine on this matter because I found the public records in question are the subject of a disputeinactivelitigation. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b). Attorney Bednar sought reconsideration of this determination on February 6, 2018. The Department provided a reply on February 13, 2018.
Page 3 January 23, 2018 SPR18/032 = Whereas the public records in question are the subject of a disputeinactivelitigation, I decline to opine on this matter. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b). It should be noted that a change in the status of the litigation could impact the applicability of 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b). Alerea Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records ce: Charlotte L. Bednar, Esq.
and/or officers and/or employees of the police department between the dates of May 1, 2022 and April 14, 2023 that make reference to and/or cite, in whole or in part, the following sentences (as they appear in said records, designated with quotation marks (example: Public Records), broadly construed. the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) the responsive records in question are the subjects of dispute
The Supervisor of Records may deny public records request appeals if the public records in question are the subject of disputes inactivelitigation. 950 CMR 32.08; SPR22/1304; SPR22/1373. Here, these records are subjects of disputes in two active cases. First, Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
Pending litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactivelitigation, administrative hearings or mediation. In light of the pending matter, I decline to opine on this matter at this time. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b).
Pending litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactivelitigation, administrative hearings or mediation. Upon review, it is my understanding that the underlying matter has not been resolved.
Because the records you seek are the subject of a disputeinactivelitigation and you have a unique right of access to such materials through discovery procedures, the public records law is not the proper mechanism to make such a request ... Given that, the Town does not intend to produce those records a second time in response to your public records request. Leo Mercado Page 3 December 4, 2024 SPR24/3127 Current appeal In his appeal, Mr.