McGovern requested to review or copy any complaints made by the DAO to the Commission on Judicial Conduct (Commission) over the past five (5) years. Previous determination In my November 10 determination, I found the Office's August 3 and October 26,2016 responses met the statutory and regulatory obligation of citing and specifically explaining that Exemption (a) and G.

M.G.L. c. 221, 34E, Para. 8. 3 4 The other six are the: 1) SJC, 2) Commission on Judicial Conduct, 3) Board of Bar Examiners, 4) Committee for Public Counsel Services, 5) Appeals Court, and 6) Trial Court. See generally https://budget.digital.mass.gov/summary/fy22/enacted/judiciary?tab=budgetsummary.

The other six (6) are: the SJC, the Appeals Court, the Trial Court, the CPCS, the Board of Bar Examiners, and the Commission on Judicial Conduct.1 For FY 2022, MHLAC was allocated $2,272,481 in state appropriations, approximately 65% of which was earmarked for its staffs wages & salaries and employee benefits.2 In addition to its state funding, MHLAC is statutorily authorized to accept additional funding through grants or donations from any source

Commission on Judicial Conduct, 380 Mass. 263, 266-267, 402 N.E.2d 1356 (1980). The commission intended its dismissal to be the end of its involvement in this dispute; this decision is not part of a continuing sequence of commission involvement with these parties. Contrast Worcester Indus. Technical Inst. Instructors Ass'n Inc. v.

Commission on JUdicial Conduct proceedings. "Except as provided In this section, all proceedings of the commission shall be confidential until there has been a determination of sufficient cause and formal charges have been filed with the supreme judicial courL" (G.L. 6, 211C, 6).