Tags
Agencies
Show All
Displaying items 181-190 of 346 in total
Department of Labor Relations Cases
Melrose Education Association / Melrose School Committee
3 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
Town of Dennis, 12 MLC 1027, 1030, MUP-5247 (1985). For example, school committees have the exclusive prerogative to determine certain matters of educational policy without bargaining. Lowell School Committee, 26 MLC 111, 113, MUP-1775 (January 28, 2000).
4 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
Town of Dennis, 12 MLC 1027, 1030, MUP-5247 (June 21, 1985). The Law exempts from collective bargaining certain types of managerial decisions that must, as a matter of policy, be reserved to the public employers discretion. See IBPO, Local 346 v.
Department of Labor Relations Cases
JOHN B. WALSH / CAMBRIDGE HEALTH ALLIANCE
4 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination, 431 Mass. 655 (2000); Town of Dennis, 29 MLC 79, 83 (2002). It is Respondents position that Charging Party has provided no direct evidence that the lay-off decision was related to any protected concerted activity. Direct evidence is evidence that, if believed, results in an inescapable, or at least highly probable, inference that a forbidden bias was present in the workplace.
3 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
Town of Danvers, 3 MLC 1559 (1977); See Town of Dennis, 12 MLC 1027(Towns decision to discontinue paid details at liquor service establishments I a level of services decision) Boston School Committee, 13 MLC 1444 (1987) (The Number of custodians to assign to each building is a managerial decision). In City of Lynn v. Labor Relations Commission, 43 Mass. App.
3 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
Town of 2 The Union did not present any evidence of negative impact at the investigation. 3 Dismissal (contd) MUP-20-7813 Bolton, 32 MLC 20, 25, MUP-01-3254 (June 27, 2005) (citing Town of Dennis, 29 MLC 79, 83, MUP-01-2976 (October 10, 2002); City of Peabody, 25 MLC 191, 193, MUP-9861 (May 21, 1999)). Here, the Union failed to meet its burden to demonstrate that the Town independently violated Section 10(a)(1) of the Law.
Department of Labor Relations Cases
SYED ZULFI / National Association of Government Employees
5 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
Ct. 926 (1992): Town of Dennis, 26 MLC 203 (2000). The sixmonth period of limitations begins to run when the adversely affected party receives actual or constructive notice of the conduct alleged to be an unfair labor practice. Town of Lenox, 29 MLC 51, 52 (2002). A significant portion of Syeds presentation at the investigation concerned conduct that occurred six months before the date he filed the charge.
Department of Labor Relations Cases
AFSCME, Council 93, AFL-CIO / Seekonk, Town of
5 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
Town of Dennis, 28 MLC 297, 3030 n.14, MUP-2634 (April 3, 2002). Thus, | dismiss this portion of the charge.
Department of Labor Relations Cases
Natasha Levarity / SEIU, Local 888
5 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
(September 5, 2002) (citing Town of Dennis, 26 MLC 202, 205, MUP-1868 (April 21, 2000)); Felton v. Labor Relations Commission, 33 Mass, App. Ct. 926, 938 (1992). The six months period of limitations begins to run when the adversely affected party receives actual or constrictive notice of the conduct alleged to be an unfair labor practice. Wakefield School Committee, 27 MLC 9, 10, MUP-2241 (August 16, 2000).
3 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
Town of Dennis, 3 MLC 1559, 1576-77 (Department analyzed procedure where firefighters were asked to submit more information on their time slips as potential de minimis alteration in working conditions). Generally, the Board will not find an unlawful change to employees' terms and conditions of employment where the action complained of is only a slight departure from what is normally required.
3 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
Town of Dennis, 3 MLC 1559, 1576-77 (Department analyzed procedure where firefighters were asked to submit more information on their time slips as potential de minimis alteration in working conditions). Generally, the Board will not find an unlawful change to employees' terms and conditions of employment where the action complained of is only a slight departure from what is normally required.
Displaying items 181-190 of 346 in total