The ATA ratified the settlement agreements for all four units on November 16, 2021. The School Committee ratified the settlement agreements for all four units at their School Committee meeting on the evening of November 17, 2021. The settlement agreements were signed by both parties on December 1, 2021. Also on December 1, 2021, the ATA inquired about when the payment of retroactive wages would occur.

The ATA ratified the settlement agreements for all four units on November 16, 2021. The School Committee ratified the settlement agreements for all four units at their School Committee meeting on the evening of November 17, 2021. The settlement agreements were signed by both parties on December 1, 2021. Also on December 1, 2021, the ATA inquired about when the payment of retroactive wages would occur.

On September 13, 2021, the parties reached a settlement on successor agreements for all four(4) Units (Teachers, Administrative/Technical Assistants, Paraprofessionals, Custodians). The Agreement included a cost-of-living adjustment retroactive to July 1, 2020. On November 16 and 17, respectively, the Union and the School Committee ratified the Settlement Agreements.

Mirick, O'Connell, DeMallie & Lougee, LLP 100 Front Street Worcester, MA 01608 Dear Attorney Moschos: This office has a received a petition from Allen Nitschelm of the Acton Forum appealing the response of the Acton-.Boxborough Regional School District (School) to his request for a copy of a settlement agreement between the School and a specifically identified School employee. See G. L. c. 66, 10(b); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(6).

Mirick, O'Connell, DeMallie & Lougee, LLP 100 Front Street Worcester, MA 01608 Dear Attorney Moschos: This office has a received a petition from Allen Nitschelm of the Acton Forum seeking further consideration of Acton-Boxborough Regional School District's (School) response to his request for a copy of a settlement agreement between the School and a specifically identified School employee. See G. L. c. 66, IO(b); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(6).

Mirick, 0' Connell, DeMallie & Lougee, LLP 100 Front Street Worcester, MA 01608 Dear Attorney Moschos: This office has a received a petition from Allen Nitschelm of the Acton Forum appealing the response of the Acton-Boxborough Regional School District (School) to his request for a copy of a settlement agreement between the School and a specifically identified School employee. See G. L. c. 66, 10(b); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(6).

On November 18, 2021, the Union and the Town entered into a settlement agreement resolving MUP-21-8635. The settlement agreement required that the Town issue all bargaining unit members an Injured on Duty Card (IOD Card) containing an individual claim number to be used by medical providers responding to IOD events.

Amento then called the union attorney and asked for his input regarding the ability of the union, through the union president, to engage in settlement negotiations with the District. Amento then approached Fire Commissioner Mycock as chairperson of the Board of Fire Commissioners to discuss with him a possible settlement of the DP discharge.

The members present who were eligible to vote: BM, ME, LS, BL, and Amento voted unanimously to try to reach a settlement agreement with the Town. Amento approached the Town and the CFC about negotiating a settlement agreement on May 18,2011. On May 19, 2011, the Union and the CFC reached an agreement.

Specifically, Pierce contends that the Union denied him fair representation by improperly voting on his grievance and ignoring his input with respect to a settlement that totally disregarded his rights. The Board has reviewed the Investigators dismissal letter in light of the parties arguments on review and finds no error. The Board therefore affirms the Investigators dismissal of this charge.

Richardson's grievance as per the process stipulated in the collective bargaining agreement, Director of Pupil Services Bazyk proposed to the GEA representative that the grievance be settled with a lump sum settlement and solicited a proposal from the GEA toward that end. However in the midst of the ensuing negotiations Mr. Bazyk abruptly stated that he did not have the authority to negotiate the matter and the GEA, then ceased negotiating.

The parties are expected to bring to the mediation individuals with settlement authority, or if that is impossible to have those with settlement authority available by telephone that day. Under no circumstances will mediation delay the scheduled Expedited Hearing date.

During the meeting, Bazyk made a settlement offer to the Union. { Response: The Respondent is without sufficient information allegations contained in Paragraph 14. 15. so as to either admit or deny the Later in the April 2, 2015 meeting, Bazyk stated that he did not have the authority to reach a settlement and ceased negotiating with the Union.

The FTA alleges that the FSC has repudiated the terms of a settlement agreement reached between the parties and concerning Gene Zanella. The FSC denies that it has repudiated the terms of that settlement agreement. First, the FSC has put into place paragraphs 1 and 2 of that Settlement Agreement. Mr. Zanella was returned to a full physical education teaching schedule at Framingham High School per paragraph 1 of the Settlement Agreement.

The charging party alleges that the employer bargained in bad faith and repudiated the terms of a Settlement Agreement reached between the Framingham Teachers Association and the Framingham Public School Committee for Eugene Zanella.

With respect to the settlement agreement at issue, I found the Board must explain whether the responsive settlement agreement was within the Board's possession, custody, or control. In its October 3rd response the Board provided Mr. Norris a copy of a "CMR." The Board withheld responsive emails under Exemptions (a), (c), and (f) of the Public Records Law.

Norris requested 7 categories ofrecords including identified policies, letters, and emails, as well as an Annual Statistical Report and settlement agreement. Previous determinations This request was the subject of previous determinations. See SPR19/1845 Determination of the Supervisor of Records (September 24, 2019); SPRl 9/2106 Determination of the Supervisor of Records (October 29, 2019).

Norris requested 7 categories of records including identified policies, letters, and emails, as well as an Annual Statistical Report and settlement agreement. Previous determinations; in camera review This request was the subject of previous determinations and subsequent in camera review.

, have successfully entered into negotiations which have resulted in a compromise settlement upon the following terms and conditions: NOW, THEREFORE, MEP, the Union, and the Commonwealth (the parties), in consideration of their mutual promises and covenants contained herein, agree as follows: 1.

Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (1), Employee Organization (O), Employer (E): ae wear 2 Tignes PRMEQT eat Ue ATED eT QUT cases eas kG UPNeRe CO way 2 |O cl 40.

A settlement was reached in the matter resolving the litigation, which was dismissed in June 2019. As part of the settlement, the Plaintiff agreed to pull the project back from the wetlands and install permanent markers designating a 50-foot no-disturb limit. This matter is now closed.

The Chief of Police shall be kept informed of the status of the case and the final court determination or settlement. RULE 8.9 - CRIMINAL CONDUCT Employees shall not commit any criminal act (felony or misdemeanor), or violate the regulatory or criminal laws or statutes of the United States or of any state or local jurisdiction (by-law/ordinance), whether on or off duty.

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Commissioner of Administration and Finance (Department of Correction) (DOC) and the New England Police Benevolent Association, Inc. (the UNION), enter into this Settlement Agreement as a result of the parties mutual desire to resolve the issues raised in the above-referenced charge of prohibited practice. 1.