Search help (advanced operators, examples)
Learn more
Tags
Agencies
Show All
Displaying items 151-160 of 8624 in total
Public Records Requests
Hull Artists (Department of Conservation and Recreation)
84 documents · · Department of Conservation and Recreation · Fulfilled
Some signs of settlement and bowing of the exterior wall were observed at the northeast corner of the structure. A test pit is recommended at this corner in order to identify potential foundation deficiencies. It is unclear if we would be responsible for structural issues or if that is a DCR responsibility. Since we would not be the owners of the building, it would seem appropriate that this would fall under DCR's purview.
Some signs of settlement and bowing of the exterior wall were observed at the northeast corner of the structure. A test pit is recommended at this corner in order to identify potential foundation deficiencies. It is unclear if we would be responsible for structural issues or if that is a DCR responsibility. Since we would not be the owners of the building, it would seem appropriate that this would fall under DCR's purview.
Some signs of settlement and bowing of the exterior wall were observed at the northeast corner of the structure. A test pit is recommended at this corner in order to identify potential foundation deficiencies. It is unclear if we would be responsible for structural issues or if that is a DCR responsibility. Since we would not be the owners of the building, it would seem appropriate that this would fall under DCR's purview.
Some signs of settlement and bowing of the exterior wall were observed at the northeast corner of the structure. A test pit is recommended at this corner in order to identify potential foundation deficiencies. It is unclear if we would be responsible for structural issues or if that is a DCR responsibility. Since we would not be the owners of the building, it would seem appropriate that this would fall under DCR's purview.
Some signs of settlement and bowing of the exterior wall were observed at the northeast corner of the structure. A test pit is recommended at this corner in order to identify potential foundation deficiencies. It is unclear if we would be responsible for structural issues or if that is a DCR responsibility. Since we would not be the owners of the building, it would seem appropriate that this would fall under DCR's purview.
Department of Labor Relations Cases
Somerville Police Employees Association / Somerville, City of
10 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
MUP-154574, on July 15, 2015, the parties reached a settlement agreement resolving the portion of the charge alleging that the Employer unlawfully unilaterally transferred IT work to employees outside the bargaining unit. The settlement agreement (Settlement Agreement) reached by the parties stated, in relevant part, 1. SPEA agrees to withdraw the allegations of its prohibited practice charge related to the transfer of IT work. 2.
That settlement agreement stated, in pertinent part: The City agrees that it will continue to assign Officer Mark Nevin to the IT Department to perform IT work on a full-time basis for the duration of Nevins assignment to light duty.
The Settlement Agreement On or about July 15, 2015, the parties entered into a settlement agreement to assign Officer Mark Nevin (Nevin) to the Information Technology (IT) Department to perform IT work on a full-time basis (IT position) for the duration of his light duty assignment.
The parties are expected to bring to the mediation individuals with settlement authority, or if that is impossible to have those with settlement authority available by telephone that day. Under no circumstances will mediation delay the scheduled Expedited Hearing date.
The terms of the JLMC award do not impact the question of whether the City repudiated the settlement agreement at issue. Iam available for a conference call at any time today should one be necessary.
On July 15, 2015, SPEA and the City agreed to partially resolve a prohibited practice charge filed by SPEA through a settlement agreement. agreement provided, That The City agrees that it will continue to assign Officer Mark Nevin to the IT Department to perform IT work on a full-time basis for the duration of Nevins assignment to light duty.
To appeal the Department of Labor (DLR) Order (Order) entered on April 5, 2016, dismissing the claim the City repudiated a settlement agreement in violation of 10(a)(5), and derivatively Section 10(1)(1), of M.G.L. c. 150E, the SPEA filed a Request for Review seeking the Commonwealth Employment Relations Board (CERB) issue an order overturning the Investigators decision, and directing a complaint to issue. 1 For the reasons set forth below, and those
Open Meeting Law Determinations
DETERMINATION - 2/7/2018 - OML 2018-15 - NORWOOD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
1 document · · Attorney General's Office · Violation
On December 16, 2016, the Board held a joint meeting with the Norwood Board of Selectmen to discuss potential settlement of the Avalon litigation, given the unfavorable outcome in the Davis Marcus matter.3 It was decided that town counsel would pursue settlement discussions with Avalon. On May 10 and 16, 2017, the Board met in executive session to discuss a conceptual settlement with Avalon.
Department of Labor Relations Cases
Boston School Committee / Boston Teachers Union Local 66
2 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
The parties reached a Settlement Agreement concerning the consolidated cases MUP-11-1081 and MUP-11-6239.
Department of Labor Relations Cases
James W. Kelley / Painters & Allied Trades Dist. Council 35, L. 1952
4 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
My case was solid not one but two settlements clearly broken and I still can't wi) because of not be able to file a-5 charges.
Both settlements were clearly broken and one was MA. Law anyhow and the other was at DSLR so not sure why with all the BPS lies they keep getting off the hook. I don't understand how a poor settlement by the Union with management that is also State law and in our contract can be broken with NO consequences. The Union tells me there's nothing they can do about their own negotiated poor settlement and violation of our contract and State law.
Kelley then reiterates the claims he made in this charge and in his previous charges that the Union made a poor settlement with management, that the settlement was broken and that he has been unable to bring any charges at the DLR regarding these issues against either the Union or his employer. Kelley expresses both his lack of faith in and disdain for the system that prevents him from taking action either against BPS or the Union.
Department of Labor Relations Cases
Westfield Firefighters Assoc. Local 1111 / Westfield, City of
4 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
On September 27, 2016, the City submitted a unilateral settlement offer (USO) to the DLR Director.
On September 27, 2016,.the City submitted a unilateral settlement offer (USO) to the DLR Director.
Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (1), Employee Organization (O), Employer (E): |I 40. Name 41. Representative to contact 42.
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing.
Department of Labor Relations Cases
Franklin County Tech. Sch. Teachers Assn. / Franklin County Technical Regional S.C.
12 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
Opinion The issue in this case is whether the School Committee failed to bargain in good faith Law of the 10(a)(5) in violation of Section unconditional support for funding a grievance Subcommittee of the School Committee. when actions settlement. of Laverty and/or Martin Martin settlement at the meeting failed offer to of the Finance To make this determination, | must first find that the parties reached a settlement to resolve the Hyson grievance
that the duty to support funding is applicable to grievance settlements. 4 CERB Decision on Review of H.O Decision (cont'd) to the employer itself.
X MUP-14-3867 xX xX xX xX EMPLOYER RESPONSE TO THE ORDER OF THE COMMONWEALTH EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD The Order required the Superintendent of the employer, Franklin County Technical Regional School Committee, to unconditionally support the settlement of the Hyson grievance. The Order also required the posting for thirty (30) days of a posting, which was attached to the Order.
OFFICER OF THE MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR RELATIONS AN AGENCY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS A Hearing Officer of the Massachusetts Department of Labor Relations (DLR) has held that the Franklin County Technical School Regional School Committee (School Committee), violated Section 10(a)(5) and, derivatively, Section 10(a)(1) of Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 150E by failing to unconditionally support the request to fund a grievance settlement
The first is that Ms. bowler determined that the parties had reached a settlement agreement (Agreement) (Complaint, paragraph 9). The facts and exhibits in this case show that the Union sent a letter to the Superintendent entitled Proposed Compromise. This document is not entitled as a Settlement or even a tentative agreement.
INTRODUCTION At issue in this matter is whether the employer breached its duty to bargain when, pursuant to a grievance settlement, the Superintendent of Schools made a formal recommendation to the School Committee that another Business Technology instructor position be added, while permitting his subordinate, the schools Principal, to immediately make a contrary recommendation.
Elyse Cann, former FCTTA President, will testify about the issue of staffing in the Business Technology Shop, the negotiations for the April 7, 2014 settlement that the employer would seek to hire a second full time instructor for the 2014 2015 school year and the statements made by members of administration at the May 27, 2014 Curriculum Subcommittee meeting and the June 4, 2014 Finance Subcommittee meeting 2.
The School District denies the parties reached a settlement agreement, and therefore the allegations contained in paragraph 9 of the Complaint are denied. 10. The School District admits the allegations contained in paragraph 10 of the Complaint. 11. The School District denies the allegations contained in paragraph 11 of the Complaint. 12. The School District admits the allegations contained in paragraph 12 of the Complaint. 13.
The Association has failed to supply with its Charge any signed settlement agreement between the parties regarding the alleged grievance resolution. The Superintendent did state that he would support the hiring of a second shop teacher only if the School Committee Finance Sub-Committee supported the hiring of a second shop teacher. 2.
Elyse Cann, former FCTTA President, will testify about the issue of staffing in the Business Technology Shop, the negotiations for the April 7, 2014 settlement that the employer would seek to hire a second full time instructor for the 2014 2015 school and the statements made by members of administration at the year 27, 2014 Curriculum Subcommittee meeting and the June 4,May2014 Finance Subcommittee meeting 2.
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.
Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04/1). INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number Matthew D. Jones, Esq. (617) 878-8283 Franklin County Tech. Teachers Association 19. Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 21.
Department of Labor Relations Cases
AFSCME, Council 93, AFL-CIO / Burlington, Town of
7 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
Settlement Agreement June 22, 2015 (c) Is there a grievance concerning this matter pending? Yes 15. Without limiting your rights to later amend your remedial request, please explain what remedy you seek. amount of any financial remedy to which you claim entitlement. L] No Include the Adhere to the parties signed settlement agreement 16. Have you attempted to settle this case? lf not, why not?
The 2015 Settlement Agreement The Town and the Union are parties to a settlement agreement (Agreement) resulting from a 2004 Unfair Labor Practice Charge which the DLR docketed as MUP-04-4157.6 This Agreement was executed on June 22, 2015 and remains in effect.
The 2015 Settlement Agreement The Town and the Union are parties to a settlement agreement (Agreement) resulting from a 2004 Unfair Labor Practice Charge which the DLR docketed as MUP-04-4157.6 This Agreement was executed on June 22, 2015 and remains in effect.
The 2015 Settlement Agreement also provided monetary settlements for Mills and six other named individuals, including Eileen Bernard (Bernard).2 Mills, in his capacity as BMEA Chapter Chair, and AFSCME Council 93 Coordinator Steve Lyons (Lyons) signed the 2015 Agreement on behalf of the Union. Town Administrator John Petrin (Petrin) and Chief of Police Mike Kent (Kent) signed on the Towns behalf.
MUP-04-4157 (2015 Settlement Agreement). The 2015 Settlement Agreement stated in pertinent part: Gerald W. Mills . . . will remain in the current detail pecking order which shall immediately follow the patrol and command officers groups with no groups ahead of [him] and [he] shall be placed in the retirement group upon retirement. 8. 2 On November 20, 2017, Chief of Police Mike Kent (Kent) issued General Order GEN17-04.
Public Records Division Appeals
SPR16/0710
1 document · · Secretary of the Commonwealth · Appeal · Brockton, City of - Law Department · Knight, Stephen · Closed
Knight requested "the settlement [a]greement between the City and" a specifically identified individual.
Department of Labor Relations Cases
Dartmouth Educators Association / Dartmouth School Committee
5 documents · · Department of Labor Relations ·
Pursuant to the directive, on May 17, 2013 the Employer forwarded to the DLR a copy of a Settlement Agreement of the parties which was reached on May 9, 2013.
Enclosed herewith a copy of the Settlement Agreement reached by the parties at the May 9" arbitration held before Arbitrator Mark Grossman. Accordingly, the Dartmouth School Committee would respectfully request that the pending unfair labor practice charge be dismissed. If you require anything further please advise. Wife. (ALG WRS/sIm Enclosure jcc Richard Mullane, Esquire Walter R. Smith ~ =a 3 = = m o - ry.
Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR The Division may 15.04(1). refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name Dartmouth Educators Association 19. 18. Representative to contact 20.
The charge at the DLR was deferred to arbitration, and on May 9 the arbitration was settled; a copy of the settlement agreement was provided by Attorney Mullane, and specifically referenced two meetings to discuss common assessments and related matters (both of which have been held) and an agreement by the School Department .,. to inform and meet with the DEA prior to the implementation of any significant adjustments to common assessments and related
Displaying items 151-160 of 8624 in total