See Town of West Springfield and Janet constructive (treating a prima face case under affirms the For the reasons set forth below, the CERB dismissal of these counts. In determining whether the Union established the third prong of the prima facie case, the Hearing what actions of the Law.

Town of West Springfield, 21 MLC 1216, 1219-20 (1994). A constructive discharge occurs when the burden imposed upon the employee causes, and is intended to cause, a change in working conditions so difficult or unpleasant as to force him or her to resign. Id. at 121920 (citing Crystal Princeton Refining Co., 222 NLRB 1068, 1069 (1976)).

Ct. 50 (1980); the insubstantiality of the reasons advanced by the employer for the action, Boston City Hospital, 11 MLC at 1702; Town of West Springfield, 8 MLC 1041, 1047-48 (1981); departure from established procedures, Town of Natick, 7 MLC 1048 (1988), affd sub nom, Board of Selectmen of Natick v. Labor Relations Comm n, 16 Mass. App.

THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ONE ASHBURTON PLACE BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02108 TEL: (617) 727-2200 www.mass.gov/ago MAURA HEALEY ATTORNEY GENERAL September 29, 2016 OML 2016-135 James Donahue, Esq. 1252 Elm Street, Suite 26 PO Box 465 West Springfield, MA 01090 RE: Open Meeting Law Complaints Dear Attorney Donahue: This office received three complaints from Ralph Page on March 28, alleging that the East Longmeadow

Dunlap, 27 MLC 113, 114 n.6, SUPL-2696 (February 9, 2001) (declining to find that drug test violated employee's rights under the United States Constitution); Town of West Springfield, 21 MLC 1216, 1222-1223 (August 19, 1994) (citing Plymouth Police Brotherhood v.

Dunlap, 27 MLC 113, 114 n.6, SUPL-2696 (February 9, 2001) (declining to find that drug test violated employees rights under the United States Constitution); Town of West Springfield, 21 MLC 1216, 1222-1223 (August 19, 1994) (citing Plymouth Police Brotherhood v.

Dunlap, 27 MLC 113, 114 n.6, SUPL-2696 (February 9, 2001) (declining to find that drug test violated employees rights under the United States Constitution); Town of West Springfield, 21 MLC 1216, 1222-1223 (August 19, 1994) (citing Plymouth Police Brotherhood v.

Dunlap, 27 MLC 113, 114 n.6, SUPL-2696 (February 9, 2001) (declining to find that drug test violated employees rights under the United States Constitution); Town of West Springfield, 21 MLC 1216, 1222-1223 (August 19, 1994) (citing Plymouth Police Brotherhood v.

Dunlap, 27 MLC 113, 114 n.6, SUPL-2696 (February 9, 2001) (declining to find that drug test violated employees rights under the United States Constitution); Town of West Springfield, 21 MLC 1216, 1222-1223 (August 19, 1994) (citing Plymouth Police Brotherhood v.

Dunlap, 27 MLC 113, 114 n.6, SUPL-2696 (February 9, 2001) (declining to find that drug test violated employees rights under the United States Constitution); Town of West Springfield, 21 MLC 1216, 1222-1223 (August 19, 1994) (citing Plymouth Police Brotherhood v.

Dunlap, 27 MLC 113, 114 n.6, SUPL-2696 (February 9, 2001) (declining to find that drug test violated employees rights under the United States Constitution); Town of West Springfield, 21 MLC 1216, 1222-1223 (August 19, 1994) (citing Plymouth Police Brotherhood v.

Dunlap, 27 MLC 113, 114 n.6, SUPL-2696 (February 9, 2001) (declining to find that drug test violated employees rights under the United States Constitution); Town of West Springfield, 21 MLC 1216, 1222-1223 (August 19, 1994) (citing Plymouth Police Brotherhood v.