Note: The OLR may decline to issue a complaint unless seasonable settlement efforts have The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settiement discussions. INFORMATION Individual () Employee Organization ) Employer w 39, The Charging Party is an: # 40, ON CHARGING PARTY LR wo . Name Cc 4eSe 48. E-mall address. . . 2 43. Address (stroet, and No.) 2H hood Cesta Jeon (G@.
: : |x | | | L oe Yes | _|No | Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 4 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the,charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 47. Name | he 48. Representative to contact 20. Cambridge Police Patrol Officers'' | Alan J. McDonald | Association _ " | 19. Address (street and No.
On or about February 24, 2016, MC, the Union, and the Employer reached a settlement agreement to resolve the allegations referenced in paragraph 6. The settlement agreement stated that it was a settlement of any and all disputes arising out of or in connection with the disciplinary charges [against MC] dated April 30, 2015.
Admitted that on or about February 24, 2016, MC, the Union, and the City reached a settlement agreement to resolve all disputes arising out of or in connection with the disciplinary charges dated April 30, 2015. Under the agreement, MC admitted to engaging in certain misconduct; the agreement was silent with respect to other alleged misconduct. The agreement included as part of its resolution a suspension without pay of twenty (20) working days.
The settlement was reached as a result of a Department of Labor Relations mediation preceding a scheduled arbitration hearing on a grievance raised pursuant to the Collective Bargaining Agreement between the Town and the Union. The Agreement ultimately resolved two grievances filed under the Collective Bargaining Agreement, as well as a related MCAD matter. The Agreement was executed by the employee, the Union and the Town.
The settlement was reached as a result of a Department of Labor Relations mediation preceding a schedule d arbitration hearing on a grievance raised pursuant between the Town and the Union. to the Collective Bargaining Agreement The Agreement ultimately resolved two grievances filed under the Collective Bargaining Agreement, as well as a related MCAD matter. The Agreement was executed by the employee, the Union and the Town.
On August 9, 2011 the Employer and Union entered into a settlement agreement to resolve a pending arbitration regarding employee Matthew Newton. (See attached settlement agreement). The settlement agreement required the employer to remove from the employee's personnel file an August 19, 2010 termination letter and all supporting documentation.
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.
Specifically, Attorney Ames requested a copy of any settlement agreement that the Town entered into relating to a matter that was discussed in executive session by the Towns Advisory Finance Commission. The Town provided Attorney Ames with a settlement agreement responsive to his request; however, the Town redacted the settlement agreement under Exemption (c) of the Public Records Law.
Specifically, Attorney Ames requested a copy of any settlement agreement that the Town entered into relating to a matter that was discussed in executive session by the Town's Advisory Finance Commission. The Town provided Attorney Ames with a settlement agreement responsive to his request; however, the Town redacted the settlement agreement under Exemption (c) of the Public Records Law.
On August 13, 2014, following a settlement agreement between Officer Piepiora and Mr. Ortiz, the parties filed a joint stipulation of dismissal. The Board held a meeting that same day. During that meeting, the Board entered into executive session pursuant to G.L. c. 30A, 21(a)(3) ("Purpose 3") to discuss whether the Board should consent to the settlement agreement.
Cole she would send a proposed settlement agreement to him to review. On February 10, 2017, Ms. Fitzpatrick sent an email to Mr. Cole with a settlement agreement for Ms. DiResta attached. See Joint Exhibit 3. On February 14, 2017, Mr. Cole sent an email to Ms. Fitzpatrick, which stated, in part: Via a proposed settlement agreement Ms. DiResta will be permanently removed from the hot line and receive a five (5) day suspension.
Management Manner of Settlement in Last Two Contract Negotiations (Mediation, Fact Finding, etc.) (1) 2013-2016 MOU Negotiated after JLMC Award not funded, (2) 2005-2008 MOU Negotiated.
Efile DLR (EOL) From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Jocelyn Silverlight Wednesday, May 24, 2017 2:53 PM Efile DLR (EOL) Re: Confirmation for on-line filing of CHARGE OF PROHIBITED PRACTICE Parking Grievance.docx; Settlement Agreement RAU parking grievance Feb 2017.docx; 2013 - 2018 RAU CBA Booklet-2.docx Attached are the original grievance, Thank you the settlement agreement and the unit CBA.
The grievance was placed in abeyance pending the resolution of the case by means of a settlement. | B. WPS repudiated the settlement and Brenner subjected Coughlin to retaliation | WPS repudiated the settlement of the grievance. First, there was not an acknowledgement in front of the faculty of Brenners inappropriate public reprimand of Coughlin.
Mediated Settlement of Initial Grievance On November 1, 2017, the EAW filed a grievance against the District over an alleged public reprimand of EAW member Jocelyn Coughlin by the building principal. On May 3, 2018, there was an informal mediated settlement by which the parties attempted to resolve the matter.
Although the Committee admits that Binienda asked Brenner to recognize Coughlins achievements and that Brenner agreed to so do, the Committee denies that the parties reached any settlement agreement. According to the Committee, the parties practice is to reduce settlement agreements of grievances to writing due to the size of the WPS. By email on May 7, 2018, Coughlin wrote to Brenner: Thank you for recognizing my work with the Techfair today.
On May 3, 2018, there was a mediated settlement by which the WPS and Principal Brenner agreed that (1) Principal Brenner would address the inapporpriate public reprimand in a faculty meeting, (2) the principal agreed to be mindful of his communication and treatment of educators, (3) the principal agreed to recognize Ms.
According to the STA, the Committee bargained regressively when: [{I]t proposed already implemented settlement provisions on 1/30/13. ... Teixeira had already been denied stipendiary positions in November of 2012 whose denial was proposed as part of referenced settlement provisions. Also, on 1/30/13, School Committee...proposed prospective waiver by the Association of defenses against off duty conduct-related infractions. Il.
According to the STA, the Committee bargained regressively when: [I]t proposed already implemented settlement provisions on 1/30/13. ... Teixeira had already been denied stipendiary positions in November of 2012 whose denial was proposed as part of referenced settlement provisions. Also, on 1/30/13, School Committee...proposed prospective waiver by the Association of defenses against off duty conduct-related infractions. II.
The Hearing Officer correctly found that the SBRSD did nothing in violation of c. 150E by including in its written settlement proposal a waiver of claims by Teixeira and the Association related to the underlying dispute. (Waiving claims related to the underlying dispute is standard in any settlement agreement. It is the essence of the settlement.)
School Committee engaged in bad faith bargaining and regressive bargaining when it proposed already implemented settlement provisions on 1/30/13. Affected employee, James Teixeira had already been denied stipendiary positions in November of 2012 whose denial was proposed as part of referenced settlement provisions.
Peloquin: On July 11, 2013, the Somerset Teachers Association (Union) filed a charge of prohibited practice with the Department of Labor Relations (DLR), alleging that the Somerset-Berkley Regional School District (Committee) engaged in prohibited practices within the meaning of Sections 10(a)(5) and, derivatively, Section 10(a)(1) of Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 150E (the Law) by repudiating a settlement agreement and engaging in regressive
Other: (a) The parties agree that the language of all parts of this Settlement Agreement shall be construed as a whole, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against either party. (b) This Settlement Agreement is without prejudice to and shall not serve as precedent in any other case or matter, and that it shall not be used in any other proceeding, except one to enforce its terms.