Maron sought the following records for the period of January 1, 2015 to present: [1] A list of all civil suits filed against Marblehead Police Department [Department] or an employee thereof, for actions or omissions committed in the course of employment, containing the following information: [a] Case caption[;] [b] Docket number[;] [c] Final disposition[;] [d] Amount of money, if any, paid by the [Town] or involved officer pursuant to a verdict of settlement

Maron sought the following records for the period of January 1, 2015 to present: [1] A list of all civil suits filed against [the Department] or an employee thereof, for actions or omissions committed in the course of employment, containing the following information: [a] Case caption[;] [b] Docket number[;] [c] Final disposition[;] [d] Amount of money, if any, paid by the [Department] or involved officer pursuant to a verdict of settlement. [2] A

In an effort to address these issues, the Hospital and NAGE entered into negotiations which resulted in a settlement agreement executed on February 7, 2013 and appended hereto as Attachment 21. Attachment 2. Page 5 of 15 28. This settlement agreement was negotiated on behalf of the Hospital by Director of Labor Relations Martha Lipchitz OConnor (OConnor).

Employee deemed returning to employment necessary in order to rebut Western MA Hospital's allegations concerning below standard performance and inappropriate behavior, which employee has recently decided to continue once returning to work for the Department of Mental Health and once realizing the injustice received in the form of a settlement agreement pertaining to title alteration, resulting in an undisclosed salary reduction of almost $7000., and

Dismissal Aromandos charge alleges that the Commonwealth violated the Law when it engaged in retaliatory harassment while Aromando was serving as an Administrative Secretary | at the Western Massachusetts Hospital and by executing a settlement agreement with Aromando and NAGE on February 7, 2013.

The real problem in these negotiations is an intransigent employee element (or elements) within the MEBA bargaining unit that have now refused to ratify tentative contract settlements four (4) times, despite the parties good faith bargaining efforts, the resulting tentative agreements, strong recommendations of their Union bargaining committee representatives, and despite even a DLR Mediators recommendation to approve the latest of the tentative contract

The real problem in these negotiations is an intransigent employee element (or elements) within the MEBA bargaining unit that have now refused to ratify tentative contract settlements four (4) times, despite the parties good faith bargaining efforts, the resulting tentative agreements, strong recommendations of their Union bargaining committee representatives, and despite even a DLR Mediators recommendation to approve the latest of the tentative contract

In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.

Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. 2 INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (I), Employee Organization (O), Employer (E): E 40. Name City of Methuen 42. Telephone Number 978-983-8505 41.

Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge toa Division mediator for settlement discussions. th icici call INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39, The Charging Party i is anan Individual (1), Employee Organization (O),O Employer (E): ; 40.

Fait accompli Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. 2a | | J INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (I), Employee Organization (O), Employer (E): |E 40. Name 41. Representative to contact 42. Telephone Town of Scituate . John J.

Yes, I have been working with my Union, Massachusetts Organization of State Engineers and Scientists (MOSES), through the Grievance Process outlined in the Collective Bargaining Agreement Between the Commonwealth of MA and MOSES' for the past 5 months Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1).

Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging partly 456 CMR 15.04/1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 18, Name Massachusetts Port Authority 20. Address (street and-No., 19. Representative to contact 21. Telephone Number Joseph P.

Fa Tl Yes Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR No 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name Teamsters Local Union No. 25 19. 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number Brian J.