Unless an extension of time has been requested, a public body must, within 14 business days of receipt of an Open Meeting Law complaint, send a copy of the complaint to the Attorney General's Office and notify the Attorney General's Office of any remedial action taken. G.L. c. 30A, 23(b); 940 CMR 29.05(5), (6). Here, the original complaint was filed with the Board on July 18. Therefore, the Board should have responded no later than August 7.

Sheehan by telephone on August 8. 1 All dates refer to the year 2016. 2 Although the Commission's May 4 letter addresses the allegations against both public bodies, we remind the Board that unless an extension of time has been granted, a public body must, within 14 business days of receipt of an Open Meeting Law complaint, review the complaint, send a copy of the complaint to the Attorney General's Office, and notify the Attorney General's Office

The Department subsequently responded to her request, most recently indicating it had "inquired again and expect[s] to hear back from the [Attorney General's Office] on the status of the motion to stay." Unsatisfied with the Department's response, Ms. Jarmanning petitioned this office and this appeal was opened as a result.

Unless an extension of time has been requested, a public body must, within 14 business days of receipt of an Open Meeting Law complaint, send a copy of the complaint to the Attorney General's Office and notify the Attorney General's Office of any remedial action taken. G.L. c. 30A, 23(b); 940 CMR 29.05(5), (6). Here, the complaint was filed with the Board on July 25, and the Board did not respond until August 29.

Unless an extension of time has been granted, a public body must, within 14 business days of receipt of an Open Meeting Law complaint, send a copy of the complaint to the Attorney General's Office and notify the Attorney General's Office of any remedial action taken. G.L. c. 30A, 23(b); 940 CMR 29.05(5), (6).

[A] copy of any Waivers that were signed by the City of Lowell with either the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and/or the Massachusetts Attorney General Offices, or the United States Department of Justice, and related to the following MDL lawsuits against pharmaceutical companies named [in a list of approximately six companies]. ... 2.

We paid 4 invoices to the Stirm Group. [4] [sic] [An identified individual] has stated We do not have direct communication with the Attorney Generals Office or the District Attorneys Office. Kerri Ann McManus Page 3 June 25, 2025 SPR25/1683 Current Appeal In his appeal petition, Mr. Wood cites the Open Meeting Law and states: This is an appeal of Georgetowns denial to produce draft executive session meeting minutes relative to the Stirm Group.

The Attorney General's Office considers a document to be "used" at a meeting when it is, at a minimum, physically present, verbally identified, and its contents are discussed by members of the public body during an open session. See OML 2012-42; OML 2011-18. Here, a copy of the Inspector General's "complaint" was not present at the June 16 meeting.

Rufo followed up her requests with 1 For purposes of clarity, we will refer to you in the third person. 2 Unless an extension of time has been requested, a public body must, within 14 business days of receipt of an Open Meeting Law complaint, review the complaint and send a copy of the complaint to the Attorney General's Office and notify the Attorney General's Office of any remedial action taken. G.L. c. 30A, 23(b); 940 CMR 29.05(5), (6).

We also reviewed the notices of and minutes from the Commission meetings held on January 1 Unless otherwise specified, all dates in this letter refer to the year 2015. 2 We remind the Committee that, unless an extension of time has been requested, a public body must, within 14 business days of receipt of an Open Meeting Law complaint, send a copy of the complaint to the Attorney General's Office and notify the Attorney General's Office of any remedial