Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the sex offender registry board issues a stay of a final classification in a sex offender registry board proceeding, then such stay shall be for not more than 60 days but if a court issues a stay of a final classification in a court appeal held pursuant to section 178M of chapter 6, then such hearing shall be expedited and such stay shal!

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the sex offender registry board issues a stay of a final classification in a sex offender registry board proceeding, then such stay shall be for not more than 60 days but if a court issues a stay of a. final classification in a court appeal held pursuant to section 178M of chapter 6, then such hearing shall be expedited and such stay shall be for not more than60 days, without written findings and good cause shown.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the sex offender registry board issues a stay of a final classification in a sex offender registry board proceeding, then such stay shall be for not more than 60 days but if a court issues a stay of a final classification in a court appeal held pursuant to section 178M of chapter 6, then such hearing shall be expedited and such stay shall be for not more than 60 days, without written findings and good cause shown.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the sex offender registry board issues a stay of a final classification in a sex offender registry board proceeding, then such stay shall be for not more than 60 days but if a court issues a stay of a final classification in a court appeal held pursuant to section 178M of chapter 6, then such hearing shall be expedited and such stay shall be for not more than 60 days, without written findings and good cause shown.

POLICE MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EXECUTIVE OFFICE for ADMINISTRATION and FINANCE EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF EDUCATION EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY SERVICES AND SECURITY CENTER FOR HEALTH INFORMATION & ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE OFFICE for ADMINISTRATION and FINANCE EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF EDUCATION STATE RECLAMATION BOARD EXECUTIVE OFFICE for ADMINISTRATION and FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF PUBLIC SAFETY & HOMELAND SECURITY SEX

Sex Offender Registry Board, 444 Mass. 1009 (2005) (citing Stowe v. Bologna, 32 Mass. App. Ct. 612, 615 (1992)). However, this authority must be used sparingly if administrative decisions are to have resolving force on which persons can rely. Stowe v. Bologna, 32 Mass. App. Ct at 616.

EEC shall have access to and use of all available Criminal Offender Record Information, juvenile, and sealed records, and Sex Offender Registry Information in order to review and approve the staffing of emergency child care programs. Vulnerable children and children of families who work to maintain the health, safety, and welfare of all Comnionwealth residents shall receive priority access to such emergency child care programs.

..................................................................... 500-6 600 PROPERTY MANAGEMNET Collection and Preservation of Evidence .................................................................. 600-1 Evidence and Property Control ................................................................................ 600-2 700 RECORDS Criminal Offender Record Information (C.O.R.I.) ..................................................... 700-1 Sex

Doe, Sex Offender Registry Bd. No. 10800 v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 459 Mass. 603, 630-631 (2011) (court without jurisdiction to hear constitutional challenge to agencys enabling statute and implementing regulations when first brought on appeal from agency decision rather than in declaratory judgment action in court). If after Janus v. American Fedn of State, County, & Mun. Employees, Council 31, 138 S.

Doe, Sex Offender Registry Bd. No. 10800 v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 459 Mass. 603, 630-631 (2011) (court without jurisdiction to hear constitutional challenge to agency's enabling statute and implementing regulations when 11 agree with the board, and thus vacate that portion of the board's decision as moot. It is a "general rule that courts decide only actual controversies . . . and normally do not decide moot cases." Boston Herald, Inc. v.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the sex offender registry board issues a stay of a final classification in a sex offender registry board proceeding, then such stay shall be for not more than 60 days but if a court issues a stay of a final classification in a court appeal held pursuant to section 178M of chapter 6, then such hearing shall be expedited and such stay shall be for not more than 60 days, without written findings and good cause shown.

See, e.g., Doe, Sex Offender Registry Bd. No. 89230 v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 452 Mass. 764, 782, 897 N.E.2d 1001 (2008) (agency erred in relying on psychiatric manual where petitioner not notified or afforded opportunity to refute that evidence); New York Cent. R.R. v.Department of 109 Police Dep't of Bos. v.

Sex Offender Registry Board, 444 Mass. 1009 (2005) (citing Stowe v. Bologna, 32 Mass. App. Ct. 612, 615 (1992)). However, this authority must be used sparingly if administrative decisions are to have resolving force on which persons can rely. Stowe v. Bologna, 32 Mass. App. Ct at 616.