Division of Capital Asset Management, 449 Mass. 444 (2007). Unsatisfied with the Citys response, Attorney Ryan appealed, and this case was opened as a result.

Division of Capital Asset Management, 449 Mass; 444, 446-48 (2007)." . Whereas the District's August 9th supplemental response provides additional information regarding the existence of the record at issue in this appeal, specifically an opinion from Attorney Sumners to the Prudential Committee, I will consider this appeal closed. Mr. Besse may appeal the substantive nature of the District's response within 90 days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1).

Division of Capital Asset Management, 449 Mass. 444, 449-50 (2007). These records would contain communications to or from our attorneys and our clients during the course of their search for legal advice or opinion that were made in confidence, provided the privilege has not been waived.

Division of Capital Asset Management, 449 Mass. 444, 450, n.9 (2007). I find the MBTA has met its burden to explain how, given the nature of the responsive records, the request could not prudently be completed without redaction or segregation. See G. L. c. 66, 10(d)(iv).

Division of Capital Asset Management, 449 Mass. 444 (2007). The Supreme Judicial Court has found that the Supervisor of Records may make a decision . . . delineating what documents among . . . requested reports are privileged or exempted from the public records act. Hull Municipal Lighting Plant v. Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co., 414 Mass. 609 (1993).

Division of Capital Asset Management, 449 Mass. 444 (2007). Mr. Herman does not appeal the application of the attorney client privilege; Mr. Herman's appeal relates solely to the failure ofthe AGO to advise him of his administrative remedies under .the Public Records Law. In particular, Mr. Herman requested this office "remind" the AGO of its "obligation to inform citizens of their right of appeal."

College is presently addressing concerns raised by AFSCME The in this Prohibited Practice Charge with the Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance (DCAMM), the Construction Management Company W.T. Rich Company and has scheduled additional testing for air quality and taken steps to ensure that the contractors are maintaining the premises in a safe manner as the renovations progress.

Division of Capital Asset Management, 449 Mass. 444, 450, n.9 (2007) namely, that the communications 1) are between MassDOT personnel and MassDOT attorneys, 2) include discussions seeking legal advice and/or opinion, 3) were sent or received during the course of the clients search for legal advice/opinion, 4) were made in confidence, and 5) the privilege has not been waived.

Division of Capital Asset Management (449Mass444), wherein the Supreme Judicial Court stated that a governmental entity may assert attorney-client privilege to protect documents against disclosure where they contain communications between lawyer and client for purpose of obtaining legal advice.

Division of Capital Asset Management, 449 Mass. 444 (2007)." In his appeal petition Mr. Goldman indicates "[t]he RAO must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. In addition, it appears that some records were withheld that were not direct communications with an attorney."