Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39, The Charging Party is an Individual (1), Employee Organization (O), Employer (E): 2 |O 41. Representative to contact Ryan Dunn 40. Name Palmer Teachers Association c/o Brett |42.

The Respondent says that reasonable settlement efforts have not yet occurred. Submitted on Behalf of the Palmer Public Schools by its General Comsel: / ean Dated: acy Li Dupere, Esq.

Srednicki: In accordance with a Settlement Agreement reached by the parties, a copy of which is attached hereto, the Federation hereby withdraws its charge of prohibited practice in the above referenced matter. Thank you. Very truly yours, oseph R. Lettiere Associate Counsel JRL/mj c Russell Durere, Esq.

Yes C] No Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04(1). INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number PFSE Local 1315, AFT Massachusetts (AFL-CIO | Joseph Lettiere, Associa te Counse | 617-423-3342 19. Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 21.

Iv] 7 Yes No Note: The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name Barnstable Teachers Association 19. 18. Representative to contact 20.

Thanks Joe Griffin Mediator | want to thank you both for your From: Houle, Laurie R Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 1:03:50 PM To: Efile DLR (EOL) Cc: Griffin, Joseph (DLR); Joan Stein (jstein@scmllp.com) Subject: MUP-18-6528 (Barnstable Public Sch) withdrawal The parties have entered into a settlement agreement in this matter. Accordingly, the Charging Party withdraws this charge with prejudice. Thank you. Laurie R.

Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (I), Employee Organization (O), Employer (E): |O 40. Name 41. Representative to contact 42.

Charging Party failed to make reasonable settlement efforts related to this Charge. 10. Respondent reserves the right to amend its Response, including, without limitation, to add such affirmative defenses as warranted. Respectfully submitted, Respondent University of Massachusetts Amherst By its Attorneys: ____________________________ Gregory A. Manousos James M.

The last time I communicated with the parties, which was in June 2020, the parties were exploring settlement options. If the case has been settled, please file a Notice of Withdrawal so the DLR can close out the case on our end. If the case has not been settled, please submit three mutually agreeable dates for the investigation to be scheduled.

ran Note: The DLR may decline to Issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY ' @ 39, The Charging Party is an: O Incividuat Employee Organization Employer @ 40. Namo #@ 41. Roprosentative to contact [Newton Firefighters, Local 863 | @ 43.

Settlement agreements The controlling case for redactions made to a settlement agreement is Globe Newspaper Co. v. Exec. Office of Admin. and Finance, Suffolk Sup. No. 11-01184-A (June 14, 2013).

Pierre signed a settlement agreement on or about August 3, 2011. In the agreement, Mr. Pierre admitted that his violation of the Departments and the Citys work rules and the laws of the Commonwealth were so serious as to justify 4 discharge from employment with the City.

Note: The Division may decline to issue a compleint unless reasonable settlement effor havets been made by the charging party, 456 CMR 18.04/11. The Division mav refer the charae to a Division media for tor settlement Olscussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name . pepeachusetts TIMConuS ers 18. Representative to contact 20. Dennis M. Coyne TicBenale mond ancora 368 Tampke Road, Sue 210, Southborough, MA 22.

SUP-15-4777 and Commonwealth of Massachusetts /Commissioner of Administration and Finance MOTION TO WITHDRAW CHARGE Pursuant to a settlement agreement in a related arbitration matter, MCOFU withdraws its charge of prohibited practice in the above captioned matter. Respectfully submitted, For the Massachusetts Correction Officers Federated Union, By its attorney, /s/ Dennis M. Coyne Dennis M.

In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.

Please let me know by the close of business on Friday, June 12, 2020, whether the case can be closed, or whether the parties need additional time to finalize the settlement. Thank you, Susan From: Leo Peloquin Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2020 10:34 PM To: Gookin, Carol (DLR) ; 'pbryant@pylerome.com' Cc: Atwater, Susan (DLR) ; Tina M.

lV] Yes a No Changes also are fait accomplis Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04(1). INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number Patrick N. Bryant 617-367-7200 Local 30 IAFF 19. Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 21.

On July 16, 2012, the NCEU : asked the DLR to dismiss because of a settlement agreement that the NCEU Case No. SCR-12-1521 had entered into with the Sheriffs ' In Case No.

If the prohibited practice complaint is dismissed or withdrawn without issuance of a remedial bargaining order or settlement agreement requiring bargaining, the petitioner may file a motion requesting that the petition be reactivated. Id. However, if a prohibited practice complaint results in issuance of a remedial order or a settlement agreement that requires the employer to bargain with the incumbent, the petition will be dismissed.