Jarmanning requested certain Sergeant and lieutenant reports, personnel orders and/or settlement agreements for certain internal affairs investigations. Prior appeal The requested records were the subject of a prior appeal. See SPR21/1946 Determination of the Supervisor of Records (August 16, 2021).
Jarmanning requested certain Sergeant and lieutenant reports, personnel orders and/or settlement agreements for certain internal affairs investigations. On July 27, 2021, the City responded. Unsatisfied with the Citys response, Ms. Jarmanning petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR21/1946, was opened as result.
Note: The DLR may decline to issue @ complaint uniees reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 488 CMR 15.04(1), 17. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 18. Representative to contact Name 20. Telephone Number Local 960, IAFF, AFL-CIO Leigh Panettiere, counsel 19. Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 617-523-2500 21.
Yes L] No Note: The Division may decline fo issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name 18. Representative to contact SEIU, Local 888 19. 20. Telephone Number John Magner 617-241-3310 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 21.
Ultimately, the parties were not successful in reaching a settlement. Thus, I held the investigation on August 2, 2022. Complaint (cont.) MUP-21-8950 parties will be given the opportunity to be heard for the purpose of determining the following allegations: 1. The City of Woburn is a public employer within the meaning of Section 1 of the Law. 2.
Grievance was denied Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (I), Employee Organization (O), Employer (E): I 40. Name Jennifer Ordway 42. Telephone Number 774-270-2872 41.
lv] Yes LJ No Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by 456 CMR 15.04(1). the charging party. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name NEBPA Local 176, Wayland Police Union 19. 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number Thomas Horgan 617-770-2929 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 21.
Since late October, 2017, and continuing, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts/Department of Transitional Assistance has repudiated Art. 7 of the parties collective bargaining agreement; the related Flextime MOU and Addendum to the Flextime MOU", and the Settlement Agreement regarding the Flex-Time MOUs and Arbitration No. 8595, by making changes which include, but are not limited to: In the Framingham office, on April 17th, members were informed that
Eustace, Kimberly (DLR) From: Sent: Jo Fletcher Tuesday, October 29, 2019 1:30 PM To: Efile DLR (EOL) Ce: Subject: lan Russell; Willis, Melinda (HRD); Sullivan, Margaret (DLR) SEIU Local 509 and DTA- SUP-18-6601 - Withdrawal Request Dear Director Roberts- Pursuant to a settlement concerning the above referenced matter, the Union hereby withdraws the Charge of Prohibited Practice. Thank you.
The Union remains open to settlement. Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Divison mediator for settlement discussions, INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY w 39, The Charging Party is an: Individual Employee Organization \ Employer # 40.
V]] ] Yes No Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04(1). INFORMATION ON CHARGING 17. Name New England Police Benevolent Assn' (NEPBA) 19. PARTY 18. Representative to contact 20. Telephone Number | Thomas E. Horgan 617-770-2929 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 21.
(NEPBA Local 82) And Town of Natick NEPBA NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL The Natick Police Superiors Union, affiliated with the New England Police Benevolent Association, NEPBA Local 82 and the Town of Natick entered into a settlement agreement resolving the above matter in its entirety. At this time NEPBA Local 82 hereby withdraws Case Number: MUP-14-4097 with prejudice.
The union failed to pursue a settlement on my behalf. I follow up with union steward Vin Pasquale on 12/19/12. Vin received a text message from Mr. Drake which stated "tell Parker he's a Step III." As documented, the Step III Conference had already occurred on April 5, 2011. If the grievance had not been pulled back on February 16, 2012, this matter would've already gone to arbitration or be settled.
N| | Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (I), Employee Organization (O), Employer (E): |O 40. Name 42. Telephone 41. Representative to contact Boston Police Detectives Benevolent Scott W.
Srednicki: The parties in the above-captioned matters have reached a Settlement Agreement, which require withdrawal of all charges with prejudice. the terms of In accordance with that agreement, this is to notify you that the Boston Police Detectives Benevolent Society does hereby withdraw its charges in MUP-16-5438 and MUP-17-5891, with prejudice, pursuant to CMR 15.06(4). Thank you for your assistance.
Employer is repeatedly engaging in the alleged misconduct; settlement effort are not atequate Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (I), Employee Organization (O), Employer (E): |O 40. Name 42.