Srednicki: The Massachusetts Laborers Public Employee Council wish to withdraw the above-mentioned arbitration cases due to settlement(s) between the Union and the Town of Wareham. Please feel free to call this office with any questions you may have. Sincerely, Tim Mahoney Business Manager MA Public Employee Council TM/sh, 340 aoe 8 Ede? adda "T. Coffey, Reg. Atty. Mark Andrews ap \ Robert Garrett 0, vy T. Hatfield, Arbitrator \ Y K.
Amount of money, if any, paid by the city or involved officer pursuant to a verdict or settlement. If there is no list, any other documents in your possession, such as civil complaints and docket sheets, containing this information. [2.] A list of officers who have been criminally prosecuted since January 1, 2015, containing the officers full name and case docket number. [3.] Any settlement agreements since January 1, 2015. [4.]
Is this the result of lawsuits or out of court settlements? Who committed the schools? 4) What is the Finance subcommittees plan for reviewing the FPS budget request? I am aware that the end result is a final number, but the final number must be understood and justified in view of overall City resources and needs. I appreciate the hard work being done by the Finance Subcommittee to arrive at a responsible budget during these difficult times.
Is this the result of lawsuits or out of court settlements? Who committed the schools? 4) What is the Finance subcommittees plan for reviewing the FPS budget request? I am aware that the end result is a final number, but the final number must be understood and justified in view of overall City resources and needs. I appreciate the hard work being done by the Finance Subcommittee to arrive at a responsible budget during these difficult times.
Is this the result of lawsuits or out of court settlements? Who committed the schools? > > 4) What is the Finance subcommittee's plan for reviewing the FPS budget request?
Kelley the placement grieved of the written warning and In 2008, other objectionable documents in his personnel file, and the grievance was headed to arbitration when it was settled pursuant to a written settlement agreement signed December 10, 2009. Meanwhile, also in 2009, Mr.
Later that year, on December 10, 2009, in lieu of arbitration, the parties reached a settlement agreement. See Charging Party Exhibit 12. B. Claims of Discrimination Based on Age In the meantime, Mr. Kelley filed a discrimination claim at the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD) on June 19, 2009. ultimately dismissed and Mr. Kelley appealed within MCAD.
Employee Records: BPS agrees that no material derogatory to an employees conduct, service, character or personality shall be placed in his/her file, whether ' * Wood executed the settlement agreement on behalf of the Employer.
Employee Records: BPS agrees that no material derogatory to an employee's conduct, service, character or personality shall be placed in his/her file, whether" 38 Wood executed the settlement agreement on behalf of the Employer.
the Union a settlement and Kelley* executed agreement stating:" WHEREAS, the Boston Public Schools (hereinafter BPS), the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades District Council No. 35, Local 1953 (hereinafter Union),? and James W. Kelley (Mr. Kelley) were parties to an arbitration AAA #11 300 00730 09. WHEREAS, the parties do not wish to continue with the arbitration process. THEREFORE, BPS, the Union and Mr.
The Committee states that the parties not wishing to continue the arbitration process entered into a settlement agreement concerning alleging placement of documents in his file without his knowledge. the allegations of placement of documents in his file without his knowledge. 10. The Committee admits that Mr.
The Committee states that the parties not wishing to continue the arbitration process entered into a settlement agreement concerning alleging place ment of documents in his file without his knowledge. the allegations of placement of docum ents in his file without his knowledge. 10. The Committee admits that Mr.
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. | Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.
Kelley argues that the nonand the School Committe settled his grievance. reappointments were the Employer's first opportunity since that settlement to punish him for pursuing the grievance. 5 Wood provided detailed explanations of why he appointed two of the three temporary area managers including the fact that they had more significant supervisory experience than Kelley.
We agreed to the settlement on that day. This was before any of the promotions in question took place. HO Decision pg. 23 line 65 Wood acknowledged that he had neither solicited received input from principals about Kelleys performance as a senior custodian. nor Mr. Wood didn't have to solicit, it came to him. With all my evaluations and letters of recommendation that Mr. Wood for sure received. All of that is input is it not?
The union and School Committee are scheduled to vote on ratification of the settlement agreement reached by the parties for a successor collective bargaining agreement. The School Committee is set to vote on ratification on November 17, 2021. In negotiations the union proposed an increase to the mentor stipend. As part of an effort to reach a settlement in contract negotiations, the union ultimately withdrew this proposal.
. & Athol Teachers Assn MUP-21-8736, 8737, 8900 & 8902 Dear Director Roberts: The parties in the above four cases have executed a settlement agreement resolving the underlying allegations in each. Accordingly, the Charging Party requests to withdraw MUP-21-8736, MUP-21-8737, MUP-21-8900, and MUP-21-8902 with prejudice. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thank you. Sincerely, Laurie R. Houle Staff Counsel cc: Kimberly Roche, Esq.
Yes No Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. 456 CMR 15.04(1). INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17. Name 18. Representative to contact Athol Teachers Association 19. 20. Telephone Number Laurie Houle 617-878-8289 Address (street and No., city/town, state, and ZIP code) 21. Fax Number MTA 2 Heritage Dr., 8th Floor, Quincy, MA 02171 617-570-4982 22.
Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been 2 made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (I), Employee Organization (O), Employer (E): |O 40. Name 41. Representative to contact 42.
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.
Note: The DLR may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party 456 CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for settlement discussions. INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 39. The Charging Party is an Individual (D, Employee Organization Employer (E): ven ee (O), (O | ae 40. Name | - '41. Representative to. 42.
Srednicki: Pursuant to a settlement between the Holyoke School Committee and Holyoke Teachers Association, the Charging Party withdraws its charge with prejudice in the above-referenced case. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me via email at ifader@massteacher.org or 617-878-8245. Thank you. Sirfcerely, Ira Fader CC: Kate OBrien, Esq. Peter McAndrew, President, Holyoke Teachers Association Alex Lomaglio, MTA Consultant 241238
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing.
Failure of Settlement Efforts The Division may decline to issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. The meeting in question occurred on February 20, 2020, and the Department Complaint was filed on February 24, 2020. The Employer was not contacted prior to filing the complaint and as such no efforts were made to resolve issue.
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Whereas the Massachusetts Correction Officers Federated Union ("MCOFU) and Christopher Wright (Wright) deny the allegations made against him on February 20, 2020 but would like to reach a mutual resolution to the above-referenced matter, MCOFU and the Plymouth County Sheriff's Department (Employer) hereby agree to resolve the above-referenced matter as follows: 1.
i Yes No Note: The Division may decline fo issue a complaint unless reasonable settlement efforts have been made by the charging party. CMR 15.04(1). The Division may refer the charge to a Division mediator for seitierment discussions. 456 INFORMATION ON CHARGING PARTY 17, Name 18. Massachusetts Correction Officers Federated Union 19. Representative to contact 20. Alan J.
Srednicki: The Chelsea School Committee and United Steel Workers have reached an agreement in full settlement of the issues in Case No. MUP-15-4751 and the undocketed CAS Petitions. A copy of that Settlement Agreement is attached: Based upon that Agreement, the School Committee is withdrawing its appeal in MUP-15-4751 and its CAS Petitions. If you have any questions, please call. Very truly yours, an S.
Committee Hearing Officer Goodberlet: I can confirm that we now have a fully-executed Settlement Agreement and that the above- referenced Charges can therefore be withdrawn from further proceedings before the DLR. Will this email constitute sufficient notice of withdrawal to the DLR or would do you need Joe Letteire and me to send separate withdrawal letters to you?
. | The Respondent denies the statement and allegation of Petitioner in Paragraph 16 and believes settlement conferences would be beneficial to the parties. 17-22. The Respondent does not believe an answer is called for in regard to Information on Charging Party contained in these paragraphs. Dated: October 6, 2011 T LOWELL SCHOOL COMMITTEE, its\Collective Bargaining Counsel, James P/ Hall, Esq.
The Respondent denies the statement and allegation of Petitioner in Paragraph 16 and believes settlement conferences would be beneficial to the parties. 17-22. The Respondent does not believe an answer is called for in regard to Information on Charging Party contained in these paragraphs. Dated: October 6, 2011 py asCole SCHOOL COMMITTEE, By iits\Collective Bargaining Counsel, James P/ Hall, Esq.
In addition, the Parties are directed to confer as to whether they are willing to engage the services of a DLR Mediator for possible settlement. Utilization of a mediator will not delay the commencement of the Hearing. 1.