Division of Capital Asset Management (Suffolk), 449 Mass. 444, 449-50 (2007) to apply a non-statutory exemption for records covered by the Districts attorney-client privilege. Accordingly, they are not being produced.

During that conversation, the Department advised, that the modified request was for, the Division of Capital Asset Management & Maintenances (DCAMMs) Report, entitled Pappas Rehabilitation Hospital for Children EHS2301: Facility & Program Existing Conditions Assessment, dated September 27, 2023. The Department responded on January 28, 2025. Unsatisfied with the Departments response, Ms.

Division of Capital Asset Management (449Mass444). The City asserts that [a] search based on the criteria outlined by Mr. Friedman returned approximately 519 documents. The city spent 4.25 hours reviewing documents and segregating those that contained privileged material. It was determined that, of the 519 documents in question, 134 were public and 385 contained privileged information.

Division of Capital Asset Management, 449 Mass. 444 (2007). The Supreme Judicial Court has found that the Supervisor of Records may make a decision . . . delineating what documents among . . . requested reports are privileged or exempted from the public records act. Hull Municipal Lighting Plant v. Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co., 414 Mass. 609 (1993).

Division of Capital Asset Management, 449 Mass. 444 (2007). The Supreme Judicial Court has found that the Supervisor of Records may make a decision . . . delineating what documents among . . . requested reports are privileged or exempted from the public records act. Hull Municipal Lighting Plant v. Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co., 414 Mass. 609 (1993).

Division of Capital Asset Management, 449 Mass. 444, 449-50 (2007). These records would contain communications to or from our attorneys and our clients during the course of their search for legal advice or opinion that were made in confidence, provided the privilege has not been waived. Therefore, MassDOT seeks the Supervisors permission to charge the requester for time spent segregating and redacting records that are responsive to the request.

Division of Capital Asset Management, 449 Mass. 444 (2007). Upon review, the Authority has not satisfied the requirement that the communications were received from an attorney during the course of the Authoritys search for legal advice from the attorney in his or her capacity as such. Further, the Authority has not satisfied the requirement that the communications were made in confidence.

Division of Capital Asset Management, 449 Mass. 444 (2007). The City further stated, [t]he withheld records consist of communications between an attorney and client related to the clients search for legal advice from the attorney in his capacity as such. All of these communications were made in confidence. In all cases the privilege as to these communications has not been waived. The Client is the City of Boston.

Division of Capital Asset Management, 449 Mass. 444, 449-50 (2007). These records would contain communications to or from our attorneys and our clients during the course of their search for legal advice or opinion that were made in confidence, provided the privilege has not been waived. Therefore, the MBTA seeks the Supervisors permission to charge the requester for time spent segregating and redacting records that are responsive to the request.

Division of Capital Asset Management, 449 Mass. 444, 449-50 (2007). These records are communications to or from our attorneys and our clients during the course of their search for legal advice or opinion that were made in confidence and our privilege has not been waived. The Authority posits that [b]ased on the above, the MBTA should be allowed to charge for this work.