Town of Watertown, 32 MLC 54, 18 56-57, MUP-01-3275 (June 29, 2001); City of Boston, 31 MLC 25, 30-31, MUP-1758 19 (Aug. 2, 2004) (citing Town of South Hadley, 27 MLC 161, 163-64, MUP-1834 (June 12, 20 2001)); see also Bristol County Sheriffs Department, 33 MLC 41, 46, MUP-03-3769 21 (Sept. 13, 2006); School Committee of Newton, 388 Mass. at 570. 22 The Board does not infer a union's waiver of its statutory right to bargain without 24 H.O.
4 documents · ·Department of Labor Relations ·
MUP-13-2912 and : Date Issued: June 13, 2014 BOSTON TEACHERS UNION " Hearing Officer: Kerry Bonner, Esq.
Related Place Occurred: Kitchen - Bourne Breach of Safety and Security Perimeter incidents Reported By : Pires Brian Description >On the Above date | Captain Pires Was working My 5am to 1pm Shift when the following incident occurred Captain Department: Kitchen Reported Date: 02/01/2013 at approximately 11:08am | was in my office in the kitchen SV 132 when Trinity Worker Johannaa Ortiz got my attention to say that someone was at the back door of the
6 documents · ·Department of Labor Relations ·
Employee signatures shall be dated within the 12 months preceding the date on which the writings are proffered to establish majority and exclusive representative status within the meaning of section 4. . 2.
Town SS Town and Mass. ew ee Finance Danvers, cc cc ccc Department and Labor Relations . ee ee ew 3 MLC ee ww tec 1559, ee cee v. Labor 340, 342-343, 345, eee te ec ee twee eee 13 AFSCME, 29 MLC 20, 21 Commission, ew ww ees 12, 443 13 (2002)..............2200. of Brookfield v. 315, 321 (2005)...
8 documents · ·Department of Labor Relations ·
WMAM-19-7700 Date Issued: June 26, 2020 CERB Members Participating: Marjorie F. Wittner, Chair Katherine G.
7 documents · ·Department of Labor Relations ·Date: 6 on, Local 5696 Date: 119 i [20144 [ | (9 205 ESd. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR RELATIONS Complainant and MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Case No.
In March 2007, the Union filed a representation petition seeking to represent among others, the Town employees at issue in this matter. and AFSCME, bargaining Council 93, MCR-07-5276 units and direction See, Town of South Hadley (Dec. 23, 2008) (decision regarding appropriate of election). After additional litigation over the Towns objections, an election was held and Unit A and Unit B were certified by the Department of Labor Relations.
Prior to March 2007, the Town of South Hadley employees at issue in this case, were non-union employees and their wages, hours, and working conditions were entirely controlled by the Town of South Hadley. In March 2007, the Union filed a representation petition seeking to represent among others, the Town employees at issue in this matter. See, Town of South Hadley and AFSCME, bargaining units Council 93, MCR-07-5276 and direction of election).