I followed up with a clarification, and received a blanket denial which included the following language: Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation.
The Department stated, [a]lthough the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive Chief Marek Karlowicz Page 3 May 25, 2023 SPR23/1006 records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation.
"the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2)" "the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation" "I support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department" Copies of any responsive communications sent or received by municipal employees and/or officers and/or employees of the police department between the dates of May 1, 2022 and April 14, 2023 that make reference to
Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation. I support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department that these records relate directly to the matters of Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
On 22 April 2023, I received a denial of all records from Lewis Chubb which included the following language: Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation.
On 22 April 2023, I received a denial of all records from Lewis Chubb which included the following language: Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation.
Chubb Page 3 May 19, 2023 SPR23/1002 [a]lthough the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation. The Department provided an additional response dated May 19, 2023 to Mr. Raymond.
Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation. It is the opinion of the Department that these records relate directly to the matters of Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
On 26 April 2023, I received a denial of all records from Chief of Police James Sevigne, which included the following language: Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation.
Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation. I support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department that these records relate directly to the matters of Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
On 28 April 2023, I received a denial of all records from Chief of Police Patricia Fisher, which included the following language: Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation.
In addition, to the extent that your request relates to the general release of POST Commission submissions, the Department intends to withhold all responsive records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation.
The Department is withholding records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subject of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation. In support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department that these records relate directly to the matters of Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
On 18 April 2023, I received a denial of all records from John Fisher, Chief of Police, which included the following language: Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation.
Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation. I support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department that these records relate directly to the matters of Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
On 13 April 2023, I received a denial of all records from Captain Brian Reid, which included the following language: Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation.
Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation. I support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department that these records relate directly to the matters of Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
On 21 April 2023, I received a denial of all records from Theresa Russell, which included the following language: Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation.
Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation. I support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department that these records relate directly to the matters of Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
On 5 May 2023, I received a denial of all records from Chief of Police Eric Shears, which included the following language: Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation.
Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation. In support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department that these records relate directly to the matters of Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.
As a general rule, appeals under the public records law may be denied if the the public records in question are the subjects of disputes inactivelitigation (950 CMR 32.08(2)(b)(1). In this matter, it is the Towns position that the pending litigation exemption is applicable to this public records request at this time.
One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 (617) 727-2832 * Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre * pre@sec.state.ma.us James Flynn Page 2 SPR22/1301 June 29, 2022 Pending Litigation As noted in my previous determination, 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes
The Departments April 19th Response In its April 19, 2023 response, the Department advised, [a]lthough the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation.
Although the Department is presently in possession of the requested records, the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2) as the responsive records in question are the subjects of disputeinactivelitigation, administrative hearings, or mediation. In support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department that these records relate directly to the matters of Hovsepian, Scott et al. v.